Michael Franco v. F Popadak et al
| Michael Franco |
| Azevedo, Canedo, Certo, -, Garcia, N Grannis, R Hall, G Miller, -, Dwayne Mugiishi, G Oyas, Persons and Persons Unknown and F Popadak |
| 2:2004cv05048 |
| July 15, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Western Division - Los Angeles Office |
| Unassigned |
| Stephen G. larson |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Forma Pauperis Denial |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
7
ORDER DISMISSING CASE by Judge Audrey B. Collins, On July 15, 2010, the court ordered that pro per plaintiff file with this Court, within twenty days, a detailed and factual report on the status of this litigation. Plaintiff failed to show cause wit hin twenty days of the date of the July 15, 2010 Order why the action should not be dismissed for failure to diligently prosecute. Moreover, the Court's Order was returned by the prison as undeliverable. Plaintiff was warned that failure to timely comply with the July 15, 2010 Order would result in the case being dismissed without prejudice. The Complaint is dismissed pursuant to Local Rules 41-1 and 41-6. Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (lmh)
|
|
Filing
5
ORDER FOR STATUS REPORT AND ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Magistrate Judge Stephen J. Hillman, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff file with this Court within twenty days of the date of this Order a detailed and factual report on the status of this litigati on. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff show cause within twenty days of the date of this Order why said action should not be dismissed for failure to diligently prosecute. Fed.R.Civ.P. 4(m); Local Rule 12. Failure to timely comply with this Order shall result in the case being dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Local Rule 12 and Fed.R.Civ.P. 4(m). Response due by 8/4/2010. (lmh)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
