City of Santa Clarita v. Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors et al

Plaintiff: City of Santa Clarita
Defendant: Cemex Inc, County of Los Angeles, Does, Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors, Roes and United States Department of the Interior
Case Number: 2:2004cv07355
Filed: November 14, 2008
Court: California Central District Court
Office: Western Division - Los Angeles Office
Presiding Judge: A. Howard Matz
Referring Judge: Fernando M. Olguin
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Notice of Removal

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
November 14, 2008 140 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER AWARDING ATTORNEYS FEES by Judge A. Howard Matz GRANTING Motion of Cemex for Attorneys Fees 120 , and Motion of Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors for Attorney Fees 116 . CEMEX sought $488,895.60 in its motion. In its reply memorand um, itrequested an additional $35,581.00 for a total of $524,476.60. (Part of theadditional sum was for fees incurred in drafting its motion for fees.) It is that amount which I award. The issues and arguments that the City raised in its o pposition to the motion of Los Angeles County and its Board of Supervisors are the same as thoseraised in CEMEX's motion. Accordingly, I incorporate the foregoing analysisand findings, add the finding that the fees of counsel for the County andSupervisors are reasonable, and award $57,599.72 in fees to the County and itsSupervisors. (jp)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: City of Santa Clarita v. Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Cemex Inc
Represented By: Patricia Scott Brody
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: County of Los Angeles
Represented By: Deborah J Fox
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors
Represented By: Deborah J Fox
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Roes
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: United States Department of the Interior
Represented By: Vince L Farhat
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: City of Santa Clarita
Represented By: Amy E Hoyt
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?