Plaintiff Perfect 10, Inc. alleges that Defendant Arlo Gilbert copied Plaintiff's copyrighted works and offered them for sale on his websites without authorization.
Perfect 10 Inc |
Arlo Gilbert and Does |
2:2004cv09098 |
November 3, 2004 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Western Division - Los Angeles Office |
Los Angeles |
Audrey B. Collins |
Suzanne H. Segal |
Copyright |
17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement |
Plaintiff |
This docket was last retrieved on May 29, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
REPORT ON THE DETERMINATION OF AN ACTION REGARDING a Copyright (cc: form mailed to Washington, D.C.) (Closing) (shb, ) |
Filing 25 STIPULATION AND ORDER by Judge Audrey B. Collins: This action between Perfect 10 and Arlo C Gilber is dismissed with prejudice with each of the parties to bear its own costs and attorneys fees. This Court shall retain continuing jurisdiction over this Action and the parties to enforce the terms of the Settlement Agreement between the parties, including by motion or by ex parte application as appropriate. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.)(ir, ) |
Filing 24 MINUTES OF PROCEEDINGSScheduling Conference held before Judge Audrey B. Collins. The Court sets the following dates: Add Claim/Parties Cut-off: 7/11/05; Expert Disclosure reports due: 10/21/05; Rebuttal reports due: 11/4/05, Expert cut-off: 11/28/05; Discovery cut-off 10/10/2005. Law & Motion Cut-off due by 12/5/2005. Final Pretrial Conference set for 1/30/2006 10:00 AM. Jury Trial set for 2/14/2006 08:30 AM.Court Reporter: Katherine Stride. (pbap, ) |
Filing 23 CIVIL JURY TRIAL ORDER by Judge Audrey B. Collins that the Court orders the following dates: a. Cut-off date for filing motions to join other parties and amending the pleadings is 7/11/2005; b. Discovery cut-off is 10/10/2005; c. Cut-off date for motions to be filed is 12/5/2005. Final Pretrial Conference is set for 1/30/2006 at 10:00 AM. Trial counsel must be present. Trial is set for 2/14/2006 at 08:30 AM (see document for further details). All counsel are to meet not later than ten (10) calendar days before trial and to stipulate as far as is possible to foundation, waiver of the best evidence rule and which exhibits may be received into evidence at the start of trial. The exhibits to be so received will be noted on the extra copies of the exhibit lists. (jp, ) |
Filing 19 Certification and Notice of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Arlo Gilbert. (pbap, ) |
Filing 22 JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Meeting Discovery Plan filed; estimated length of trial 3-4 days. (ca, ) |
Filing 21 NOTICE OF DOCUMENT DISCREPANCIES AND ORDER by Judge Audrey B. Collins ORDERING Answer to Complaint submitted by Defendant Arlo Gilbert received on 4/1/05 to be filed and processed; filed date to be the date the document was stamped Received but not Filed with the Clerk.(pbap, ) |
Filing 20 ANSWER to Complaint - (Discovery) 1 filed by Defendant Arlo Gilbert.(pbap, ) |
Filing 17 ORDER by Judge Audrey B. Collins : Denying 15 Defendant's Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction. (pbap, ) |
Filing 18 REPLY Memorandum of Points and Authorities and Evidentiary Objections in support of MOTION to Dismiss 6 filed by defendant Arlo Gilbert. (ca, ) |
Filing 16 OPPOSITION to MOTION to Dismiss 15 filed by plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (ca, ) |
Filing 15 NOTICE OF MOTION OF DEFENDANT ARLO GILBERT to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction [FRCP 12(b)(2)] filed by defendant Arlo Gilbert. Motion set for hearing on 3/28/2005 at 10:00 AM before Honorable Audrey B. Collins. (jp, ) |
Filing 14 REPLY MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES AND EVIDENTIARY OBJECTION in suppor tof defendant MOTION to Dismiss 6 filed by defendant Arlo Gilbert. (jp, ) |
Filing 13 SUPPLEMENTAL DECLARATION of ARLO GILBERT in support of Reply to Opposition to MOTION to Dismiss 6 filed by defendant Arlo Gilbert. (jp, ) |
Filing 12 DECLARATION of MITCHELL D. SAVRICK in support of Reply to Opposition to MOTION to Dismiss 6 filed by defendant Arlo Gilbert. (jp, ) |
Filing 10 ORDER by Judge Audrey B. Collins Granting the NOTICE AND REQUEST of Settlement Procedure Selection (Sp1) to Appear Before Magistrate Judge Suzanne H. Segal for settlement proceedings.(jp, ) |
Filing 11 MINUTES before Judge Audrey B. Collins: Defendant MOTION to Dismiss Action for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction 6 (In Chambers). On February 7, 2005, Defendant filed a motion to Dismiss Action for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction, noticed for hearing before this Court on March 7, 2005. Defendant, however, failed to engage in a conference with opposing counsel before filing the motion. See Local Rule 7-3. The motion is therefore STRICKEN. Court Reporter: Not Present. (jp, ) |
Filing 9 OPPOSITION to Defendant MOTION to Dismiss 6 ; DECLARATIONS of DR. Norman Zada and Jeffrey N. Mausner in Opposition to Motion to Dismiss filed by plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (jp, ) |
Filing 8 ORDER Regarding Conference by Judge Audrey B. Collins: (1) Pretrial Conference pursuant to FRCP 16 and 26 and Local Rule 26; (2) Motions and Ex Parte applications; This action has been assigned to the calendar of Judge Audrey B Collins, Courtroom 680 Roybal Federal Building, 255 East Temple Street, Los Angeles, CA 90012. All Counsel are hereby ordered to familiarize themselves with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedures and the Local Rules of Central District of California. Matter is set for a Pretrial/Scheduling Conference on 4/11/2005 10:00 AM. Joint Rule 26(f) Report shall be filed not later than one week before the scheduling conference.(See document for further details) Scheduling Conference set for 4/11/2005 10:00 AM before Honorable Audrey B. Collins.(ir, ) |
Filing 7 DECLARATION of Arlo Gilbert in Support of Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction 6 filed by Defendant Arlo Gilbert. (yl, ) |
Filing 6 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Action for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction filed by Defendant Arlo Gilbert. Motion set for hearing on 3/7/2005 at 10:00 AM before Honorable Audrey B. Collins. (yl, ) |
Filing 5 APPLICATION AND ORDER of Non-Resident Attorney to Appear in a Specific Case by Gary N Schumann for Arlo Gilbert, designating S Martin Keleti as local counsel. Fee PAID. Approved by Judge Audrey B. Collins.(jp, ) |
Filing 4 NOTICE OF LAWSUIT and Request for Waiver of Service of Summons filed by Plaintiff (rl, ) |
WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. upon Arlo Gilbert waiver sent by Plaintiff on 12/9/2004, answer due 2/7/2005. Waiver of Service signed by Mitchell Savrick. (Document filed with on same entry as number 4) (rl, ) Modified on 1/5/2005 (rl, ). |
Filing 3 ORDER RE TRANSFER PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 224 -Related Case- filed. Related Case No: CV 03-9113 ABC (SSx). Case transfered from Judge Paul L. Abrams and George P. Schiavelli to Judge Audrey B. Collins and Suzanne H. Segal for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge CV 04-9098 ABC (SSx).(rn, ) |
PREPARED ORDER RE TRANSFER Pursuant to General Order 224 (Related Case) by Clerk; related to CV 03-9113 ABC (SSx). (rn, ) |
Filing 2 CERTIFICATION AND NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc. (rrey, ) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against defendant Arlo Gilbert.(Filing fee $ 150.) Jury Demanded. , filed by plaintiff Perfect 10 Inc.(rrey, ) |
20 Day Summons Issued re Complaint - (Discovery) 1 as to Arlo Gilbert. (rrey, ) |
REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION REGARDING COPYRIGHT (cc: form mailed to Washington, D.C.) (Opening) (rrey, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.