Perfect 10 Inc v. Arlo Gilbert
Plaintiff Perfect 10, Inc. alleges that Defendant Arlo Gilbert copied Plaintiff\'s copyrighted works and offered them for sale on his websites without authorization.
Perfect 10 Inc |
Arlo Gilbert and Does |
2:2004cv09098 |
November 3, 2004 |
California Central District Court |
Western Division - Los Angeles Office |
Los Angeles |
Audrey B. Collins |
Suzanne H. Segal |
Copyright |
17:501 Copyright Infringement |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
![]() STIPULATION AND ORDER by Judge Audrey B. Collins: This action between Perfect 10 and Arlo C Gilber is dismissed with prejudice with each of the parties to bear its own costs and attorneys fees. This Court shall retain continuing jurisdiction over this Action and the parties to enforce the terms of the Settlement Agreement between the parties, including by motion or by ex parte application as appropriate. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.)(ir, )
|
24
MINUTES OF PROCEEDINGSScheduling Conference held before Judge Audrey B. Collins. The Court sets the following dates: Add Claim/Parties Cut-off: 7/11/05; Expert Disclosure reports due: 10/21/05; Rebuttal reports due: 11/4/05, Expert cut-off: 11/28/05; Discovery cut-off 10/10/2005. Law & Motion Cut-off due by 12/5/2005. Final Pretrial Conference set for 1/30/2006 10:00 AM. Jury Trial set for 2/14/2006 08:30 AM.Court Reporter: Katherine Stride. (pbap, )
|
![]() ORDER by Judge Audrey B. Collins : Denying [15] Defendant's Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction. (pbap, )
|
11
MINUTES before Judge Audrey B. Collins: Defendant MOTION to Dismiss Action for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction [6] (In Chambers). On February 7, 2005, Defendant filed a motion to Dismiss Action for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction, noticed for hearing before this Court on March 7, 2005. Defendant, however, failed to engage in a conference with opposing counsel before filing the motion. See Local Rule 7-3. The motion is therefore STRICKEN. Court Reporter: Not Present. (jp, )
|
![]() ORDER Regarding Conference by Judge Audrey B. Collins: (1) Pretrial Conference pursuant to FRCP 16 and 26 and Local Rule 26; (2) Motions and Ex Parte applications; This action has been assigned to the calendar of Judge Audrey B Collins, Courtroom 680 Roybal Federal Building, 255 East Temple Street, Los Angeles, CA 90012. All Counsel are hereby ordered to familiarize themselves with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedures and the Local Rules of Central District of California. Matter is set for a Pretrial/Scheduling Conference on 4/11/2005 10:00 AM. Joint Rule 26(f) Report shall be filed not later than one week before the scheduling conference.(See document for further details) Scheduling Conference set for 4/11/2005 10:00 AM before Honorable Audrey B. Collins.(ir, )
|
![]() APPLICATION AND ORDER of Non-Resident Attorney to Appear in a Specific Case by Gary N Schumann for Arlo Gilbert, designating S Martin Keleti as local counsel. Fee PAID. Approved by Judge Audrey B. Collins.(jp, )
|
![]() ORDER RE TRANSFER PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 224 -Related Case- filed. Related Case No: CV 03-9113 ABC (SSx). Case transfered from Judge Paul L. Abrams and George P. Schiavelli to Judge Audrey B. Collins and Suzanne H. Segal for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge CV 04-9098 ABC (SSx).(rn, )
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.