Ideaflood Inc v. About Inc et al
Ideaflood Inc |
About Inc, United Online Inc, Mega Web Services Inc and Mysite Inc |
About Inc |
Ideaflood Inc |
2:2005cv03618 |
May 13, 2005 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Western Division - Los Angeles Office |
Fresno |
R Gary Klausner |
Fernando M. Olguin |
Patent |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1338 Patent Infringement |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing
38
STIPULATION AND ORDER by Judge R. Gary Klausner re Dismissal of this Action, including all counterclaims, in its entirety and with prejudice, with the Parties to bear their own fees and costs. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.)(pbap, )
|
Filing
35
STIPULATION AND ORDER by Judge R. Gary Klausner DENIED re Continuing hearing date re MOTION for Summary Judgment[31], MOTION for Attorney Fees[32].(pbap, )
|
Filing
29
ORDER by Judge R. Gary Klausner, DENIED Modifying Schedule Order re EX PARTE APPLICATION to Extend Discovery Cut-Off Date to 3/31/2006[26].(pbap, )
|
Filing
25
ORDER Re: Settlement Proceedings by United States Magistrate Judge Fernando M. Olguin. IT IS ORDERED as follows: 1. The parties and their trial counsel shall appear for the Settlement Conference at 2:00 p.m., March 1, 2006, in the United States Courthouse, 312 North Spring Street, Courtroom F, 9th Floor, Los Angeles, California. 2. Counsel who will try the case must be present. In addition, the person with full settlement authority shall be present at the conference. 7. Each party shall deliver to the chambers of the Magistrate Judge a Confidential Settlement Conference Statement on or before February 22, 2006, at 4:00 p.m. 8. In the event any party believes, in good faith, that a settlement conference at this point in the litigation would not be meaningful, the party may contact Judge Olguin's courtroom deputy clerk and inform her of this information. 9. Counsel appearing without their clients (whether or not counsel purportedly have been given settlement authority) will cause the settlement conference to be canceled. The noncomplying party, attorney, or both, may be assessed the costs and expenses incurred by other parties as a result of such cancellation and rescheduling. 10. The failure of any party or attorney to comply with the requirements of this Order may result in sanctions being imposed. The sanctions may include, but not be limited to, the fees and costs expended by the other parties in preparing and attending the Settlement Conference. (See document for further details.)(pcl, )
|
Filing
24
MINUTES OF IN CHAMBERS ORDER by Magistrate Judge Fernando M. Olguin : This case has been referred to Magistrate Judge Olguin for settlement. Plaintiff's counsel shall contact Magistrate Judge Olguin's deputy clerk to obtain available dates for a settlement conference. Plaintiff's counsel shall contact Magistrate Judge Olguin's deputy clerk with enough time so that the settlement conference date is early enough to comply with any deadlines imposed by the District Judge or the Local Rules of this District. After obtaining available dates from Magistrate Judge Olguin's deputy clerk, counsel for the parties shall confer with each other and select one of the proposed dates. Plaintiff's counsel shall then advise Judge Olguin's deputy clerk of the settlement conference date selected by parties. Please note that all settlement conferences begin at 2:00 p.m. and are usually conducted on a Tuesday or Wednesday. (pcl, )
|
Filing
23
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER by Judge R. Gary Klausner. **see document for further details**(pbap, )
|
Filing
21
ORDER FOR JURY TRIAL by Judge R. Gary Klausner. Final Pretrial Conference set for 5/1/2006 09:00 AM. Jury Trial set for 5/16/2006 09:00 AM. (pbap, )
|
Filing
20
ORDER by Judge R. Gary Klausner Approved the NOTICE AND REQUEST of Settlement Procedure Selection (Sp1)to Appear Before magistrate for settlement proceedings.(pbap, )
|
Filing
19
MINUTES OF Scheduling Conference held before Judge R. Gary Klausner. The Court sets the following dates Amended Pleadings due by 10/15/2005. Discovery cut-off 2/14/2006. Motions cut-off due by 3/1/2006. Jury Trial set for 5/16/2006 09:00 AM. Pretrial Conference set for 5/1/2006 09:00 AM.Court Reporter: Lynne Smith. (pbap, )
|
Filing
15
ORDER by Judge R. Gary Klausner Setting Scheduling Conference, set for 9/26/2005 09:00 AM. (pbap, )
|
Filing
14
ORDER by Judge R. Gary Klausner : granting [11] APPLICATION for attorney Thomas J. Cawley to Appear Pro Hac Vice, designating Jean P. Nogues as local counsel for United Online Inc; Mega Web Services Inc; Mysite Inc and About Inc. (pbap, )
|
Filing
13
ORDER by Judge R. Gary Klausner : Granting [12] APPLICATION for attorney Brian Mark Buroker to Appear Pro Hac Vice and designating Jean Nogues as local counsel. (pbap, )
|
Filing
3
STANDING ORDER REGARDING NEWLY ASSIGNED CASES by Judge R. Gary Klausner: READ THIS ORDER CAREFULLY. IT CONTROLS THIS CASE. This action has been assigned to the calendar of Judge R. Gary Klausner. The responsibility for the progress of litigation in the Federal COurts falls not only upon the attorneys in this acion, but upon the Court as well. To secure the just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of evary aciton, Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 1, all counsel are hereby ordered to familiarize themselves with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure particularly Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 16 26, the Local Rules of the Central District of California, this Court's Order for Jury Trian, and this Court's Order for Court Trial. (See orde for further details)(shb, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.