Heuft Systemtechnik GmbH v. Industrial Dynamics Co Ltd

Justia Dockets & Filings Ninth Circuit California Central District Heuft Systemtechnik GmbH v. Industrial Dynamics Co Ltd

Heuft Systemtechnik GmbH v. Industrial Dynamics Co Ltd

Case Number:	2:2005cv06299
Filed:	August 26, 2005
Court:	US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge:	Jennifer T. Lum
Presiding Judge:	George P. Schiavelli
Nature of Suit:	Trademark

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
October 5, 2008	Filing 365 JUDGMENT by Judge George P. Schiavelli: IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREEDthat: 1) Defendant IDC did not use its outer sidewall inspection devices in a manner that infringed Claims 1, 2, and 3 of U.S. Patent No. 6,298,974, owned by Heuft; 2) Defenda nt IDC's outer sidewall inspection devices did not infringe on Claims 6, 7 and 8 of Heuft's Patent No. 6,298,974; 3) Plaintiff is ordered to reimburse Defendant in the amount of $39,287.39, which is the amount Defendant paid Plaintiff pursuant to the Courts Bill of Costs order dated, 12/13/2007. The payment must be made within 10 days of the entry of this Order; 4) Defendant is the prevailing party. This Judgment does not alter the remaining findings from the 7/6/2007 Final Judgment to the extent they are consistent with this Judgment and the Opinion of the Federal Circuit. (jp)

Date Filed

Document Text

October 5, 2008

Filing 365 JUDGMENT by Judge George P. Schiavelli: IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREEDthat: 1) Defendant IDC did not use its outer sidewall inspection devices in a manner that infringed Claims 1, 2, and 3 of U.S. Patent No. 6,298,974, owned by Heuft; 2) Defenda nt IDC's outer sidewall inspection devices did not infringe on Claims 6, 7 and 8 of Heuft's Patent No. 6,298,974; 3) Plaintiff is ordered to reimburse Defendant in the amount of $39,287.39, which is the amount Defendant paid Plaintiff pursuant to the Courts Bill of Costs order dated, 12/13/2007. The payment must be made within 10 days of the entry of this Order; 4) Defendant is the prevailing party. This Judgment does not alter the remaining findings from the 7/6/2007 Final Judgment to the extent they are consistent with this Judgment and the Opinion of the Federal Circuit. (jp)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Heuft Systemtechnik GmbH v. Industrial Dynamics Co Ltd
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?