California Department of Toxic Substances Control et al v. American Honda Motor Co Inc et al
2:2005cv07746 |
October 31, 2005 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Jeffrey W. Johnson |
Christina A. Snyder |
Environmental Matters |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 98 MINUTE ORDER by Judge Dean D. Pregerson. Case should have been closed on document filed on January 25, 2017. Docket number 96 . Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (jy) |
Filing 97 CONSENT DECREE WITH JPMORGAN CHASE, N.A., FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION,AS RECEIVER FOR WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK AND RELATED ENTITIES by Judge Dean D. Pregerson: The Parties have now reached the settlement embodied in this ConsentDecree, pursu ant to which JPMC will pay the sum of eighty-six million dollars ($86 million) to resolve the Home Savings Parties alleged liability for Response Costs, Response Actions, and other damages associated with the BKK Facility, in West Covina, California; (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILED SPECIFICS AS TO PAYMENT, DEADLINES, REQUIREMENTS AND INSTRUCTIONS THEREIN) (lc) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: California Department of Toxic Substances Control et al v. American Honda Motor Co Inc et al | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.