US Philips Corporation v. KXD Technology Inc et al

Justia Dockets & Filings Ninth Circuit California Central District US Philips Corporation v. KXD Technology Inc et al

US Philips Corporation v. KXD Technology Inc et al

Case Number:	2:2005cv08953
Filed:	December 27, 2005
Court:	US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge:	Paul L. Abrams
Presiding Judge:	Edward Rafeedie
Nature of Suit:	Patent

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
September 11, 2014	Filing 569 MINUTES OF IN CHAMBERS - ORDER AWARDING PLAINTIFF U.S. PHILIPS CORPORATION'S ATTORNEYS' FEES AND COSTS by Judge Dolly M. Gee: re: On 8/26/2014, the Court granted in part Plaintiff Philips' Motion for Attorneys' Fees and Costs [556 ], to the extent it concerned fees and costs incurred in investigating and litigating its Motion for Contempt 456 . The Court ordered Philips to file an amended declaration with an itemized accounting of fees and costs relating only to the 3/25/2010 Motion for Contempt and subsequent appeals 567 . On 8/27/2014, Philips' attorney, Robert W. Pitts, submitted a declaration with an itemized accounting of fees and costs relating to the Motion for Contempt 568 . The Court finds that the lodest ar amount and costs claimed are reasonable. The Court therefore GRANTS Philips' request for $269,758.00 in fees and $2,467.84 in costs, for a total of $272,225.84 to be paid to Plaintiff U.S. Philips Corporation by non-party KBC Bank N.V. relating to Philips' prosecution of the Motion for Contempt. Court Reporter: Not Reported. (gk)

Date Filed

Document Text

September 11, 2014

Filing 569 MINUTES OF IN CHAMBERS - ORDER AWARDING PLAINTIFF U.S. PHILIPS CORPORATION'S ATTORNEYS' FEES AND COSTS by Judge Dolly M. Gee: re: On 8/26/2014, the Court granted in part Plaintiff Philips' Motion for Attorneys' Fees and Costs [556 ], to the extent it concerned fees and costs incurred in investigating and litigating its Motion for Contempt 456 . The Court ordered Philips to file an amended declaration with an itemized accounting of fees and costs relating only to the 3/25/2010 Motion for Contempt and subsequent appeals 567 . On 8/27/2014, Philips' attorney, Robert W. Pitts, submitted a declaration with an itemized accounting of fees and costs relating to the Motion for Contempt 568 . The Court finds that the lodest ar amount and costs claimed are reasonable. The Court therefore GRANTS Philips' request for $269,758.00 in fees and $2,467.84 in costs, for a total of $272,225.84 to be paid to Plaintiff U.S. Philips Corporation by non-party KBC Bank N.V. relating to Philips' prosecution of the Motion for Contempt. Court Reporter: Not Reported. (gk)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: US Philips Corporation v. KXD Technology Inc et al
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?