Plush Lounge Las Vegas LLC v. Hotspur Resorts Nevada Inc
2:2006cv02626 |
April 28, 2006 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Unassigned |
Other |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 178 JUDGMENT by Judge George H Wu, in favor of Hotspur Resorts Nevada Inc against Plush Lounge Las Vegas LLC. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that Defendants Motion is granted as to plaintiff Plush Lounge Las Vegas, LLCs First Claim for Relief for Illegal Maintenance of Monopoly in the Relevant Market Under Section 2 of the Sherman Act and that judgment is entered for Defendant on that claim. Plaintiff Plush Lounge Las Vegas, LLC shall take nothing from Defendant. Defendant shall recover from plaintiff Plush Lounge Las Vegas, LLC all of its costs incurred in connection with this action. The Court authorizes the filing of and will entertain Defendants intended motions for attorneys fees, expenses and costs against plaintiff Plush Lounge Las Vegas, LLC and its counsel of record under Rule 37(c)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C. § 1927, and pursuant to this Courts inherent power and other applicable law. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (shb) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Plush Lounge Las Vegas LLC v. Hotspur Resorts Nevada Inc | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.