UNITED STATES OF AMERICA EX REL. et. al. v. RAYTHEON COMPANY et al
Steven Mateski and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ex rel |
Northrop Grumman Corporation and Raytheon Company |
2:2006cv03614 |
February 26, 2013 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Western Division - Los Angeles Office |
fernando m. olguin |
Otis D. Wright |
Other Statutory Actions |
31 U.S.C. ยง 3729 False Claims Act |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 200 JUDGMENT by Judge Otis D. Wright, II. It is therefore ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED as follows: 1. Relator Steven Mateski and the United States of America shall recover nothing from Defendant Raytheon Company; 2. The Fifth Amended Complaint is dismissed on the merits and with prejudice; 3. Defendant Raytheon Company shall recover its costs from Relator Steven Mateski as evidenced by a Bill of Costs. IT IS SO ORDERED. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (lom) |
Filing 165 PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Stevenson re Stipulation for Protective Order 161 (sbu) |
Filing 127 ORDER that Raytheons Motion to Dismiss for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction is GRANTED 96 . The Court finds it would be futile to grant Mateski leave to amend because not only is this his Fourth Amended Complaint, the deficiencies discussed herein cannot be remedied. Raytheons Motion to Dismiss on other grounds is DENIED AS MOOT 98 . The Clerk of Court shall close this case by Judge Otis D. Wright, II. MD JS-6. Case Terminated ) . (lc) Modified on 2/26/2013 (lc). |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.