Big Screen Entertainment Group Inc v. Davis
| 2:2006cv03800 |
| June 16, 2006 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Unassigned |
| Other |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
339
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) by Judge A. Howard Matz: The Court has been informed by Plaintiffs counsel that the action that Plaintiff seeks to hold Defendant in contempt for maintaining was voluntarily dismissed by Defendant on January 19, 2010. See Davis v. Estate of Salvatore Bonanno, CV09-1771-JAT (D. Ariz.), Docket Nos. 41 and 42. Therefore, The Court DENIES AS MOOT Motion to hold Defendant in contempt 336 . The Court will not welcome repeated efforts by either party to require the Court to exercise further jurisdiction over this matter. (jp)
|
|
Filing
310
MINUTES OF IN CHAMBERS ORDER held before Judge A. Howard Matz: re Notice of Compliance 308 , Court orders defendant BJ Davis released from custody forthwith. This Order does not release Mr. Davis from his legal requirement to comply with the remain ing provisions, relating to fines, of paragraph three of the Courts August 21, 2009 Order of Contempt. Nor does it release him from the continuing duties set forth in the March 11, 2008 Final Judgment on Consent. For the purpose of assisting the Bureau of Prisons and the United States Marshal Service, the Remand Order Number corresponding to Mr. Daviss incarceration is D7794. (se)
|
|
Filing
304
MINUTES IN CHAMBERS by Judge A. Howard Matz: BJ Davis is a pro se defendant. Pursuant to the rules of this Court, Plaintiff must serve all documents on Defendant in hard-copy format. The Court will continue to serve Defendant by mail with documents in hard-copy format. However, for the sake of convenience to him, this Court will also serve copies of orders on Defendant electronically using the email address provided by Defendant (ReelMovies@aol.com). (jp)
|
|
Filing
303
MINUTES IN CHAMBERS by Judge A. Howard Matz: The Court has been informed that Defendant BJ Davis has filed a lawsuit in the United States District Court for the District of Arizona naming the Court and others, including the Courtroom Deputy Clerk, as defendants. B J Davis v. Estate of Salvatore "Bill" Bonanno, et al., CV 09-1771-Pax-JAT. Davis lists the following as his contact information: "BJ Davis. 1155 S. Pauer Rd, Ste 14 Mesa, AZ 85206. Tel: (480) 444-2414. E-mail: ReelMovies @aol.com." The Clerk is directed to add this contact information to the service list in this case. The Court and all parties shall use it, in addition to 9903 Santa Monica Blvd, Suite 342 Beverly Hills, CA 90212, to provide notice and service to B J Davis. (See attached Minute Order for futher information). For the foregoing reasons, the Court will continue to preside over this case. (jp)
|
|
Filing
290
ORDER OF CONTEMPT by Judge A. Howard Matz. DAVIS is hereby held in Contempt of court for violation of the Final Judgment. DAVIS shall, within seven (7) days of the entry of this Order of Contempt, execute and file with the Nevada Secretary of State ( See attached Order for further information.) FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of this Court shall serve this Order of Contempt on DAVIS by electronic service via PACER and that BSEG shall make further service of this Order of Contempt on DAVIS by first class mail at 9903, Santa Monica Blvd Suite 342, Beverly Hills, CA 90212, the address provided by DAVIS to this Court. (jp)
|
|
Filing
286
MINUTES: Proceedings: Plaintiff's Motion for Contempt against B.J. David (Evidentiary) before Judge A. Howard Matz: Cause called. Witness called, sworn, and testifies. Exhibit identified and admitted. For reasons stated on the record, the Court grants plaintiff's Motion for Contempt 273 . Order to issue. Plaintiff is to submit a revised proposed order of contempt. Court Reporter: Cindy Nirenberg. (jp)
|
|
Filing
284
MINUTES OF IN CHAMBERS ORDER held before Judge A. Howard Matz re Minutes of In Chambers Order 282 : The Court has prepared the attached draft ruling on Plaintiffs motion for holding Defendant BJ Davis in contempt. Given the apparent severe adverse i mpact to the plaintiff of the defendants conduct that triggered the motion, it is imperative that the rights of the parties as to this contempt citation be determined on a prompt and timely basis. Accordingly, this Court will hold a hearing on the ma tter on August 17, 2009 at10:00 a.m. The Court is aware that Mr. Davis has claimed unavailability, not only on that date, but through October 15, 2009. The Court cannot credit that claim, given Mr. Daviss previous game-playing, as reflected in prior court rulings. Mr. Davis is invited to attend the August 17 hearing and provide at that time any admissible evidence or argument why the attached order should not be made final. (se)
|
|
Filing
246
MINUTES OF IN CHAMBERS before Judge A. Howard Matz: The Court DENIES Defendants EX PARTE APPLICATION for Order Vacating Final Judgment on Consent 241 , 242 , 243 , 244 . on procedural grounds and on the merits. Defendant has not established any r easons for proceeding ex parte rather than by way of noticed motion. On the merits, Defendant has not established that the consent judgment is void ab initio by virtue of the Courts having inserted a jurisdictional provision into the proposed consent judgment prior to approving it. Nor has Defendant demonstrated that Plaintiff has breached the parties' settlement agreement that was incorporated into the consent judgment. (jp)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Big Screen Entertainment Group Inc v. Davis | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
