United States of America v. One 2003 BMW 745i
Case Number: 2:2006cv06029
Filed: September 21, 2006
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Unassigned
Nature of Suit: Other

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 1, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 40 AMENDED CONSENT JUDGMENT by Judge R. Gary Klausner in favor of United States of America against $20,000.00 in U S Currency, $3,014.00 in U S Currency, Assorted Mens Jewelry, One 2003 BMW 745i, One 2003 Hummer H2 SUV, One 2003 Mercedes S55 A MG, One 2004 Lincoln Navigator. The United States of America shall have judgment as to $18,014.00 of the defendant currency and all other defendants, together with all interest earned by the government on $18,014.00 of the defendant currenc y, and n o other person or entity shall have any right, title or interest therein. To the extent said funds have not already been returned to Claimant pursuant to the consent judgment of forfeiture entered August 5, 2011, $5,000.00 of the defend ant currency, together with all interest earned by the government on that amount since seizure, shall be paid to Claimant not later than forty-five (45) days from the date of the entry of this judgment by a Treasury check delivered to Claimant at the federal facility where he is housed. Said payment shall be subject to applicable federal law.. (shb)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: United States of America v. One 2003 BMW 745i
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?