Jose Luna v. A J Malfi
Petitioner: Jose Luna
Respondent: A J Malfi
Case Number: 2:2007cv00148
Filed: January 4, 2007
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Office: Western Division - Los Angeles Office
County: Sacramento
Presiding Judge: Margaret M. Morrow
Presiding Judge: Alicia G. Rosenberg
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Motion to Extend Time to File
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 13, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 31 JUDGMENT by Judge Dolly M. Gee, Related to: R&R Adopting Report and Recommendations 30 . Pursuant to the order adopting the magistrate judge's report and recommendation, IT IS ADJUDGED that the petition in this matter is denied and dismissed with prejudice. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (mp)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Jose Luna v. A J Malfi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Jose Luna
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: A J Malfi
Represented By: Timothy M Weiner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?