Sarah Roper v. Keith Poma et al
| Sarah Roper |
| Keith Poma, Thomas Ake, Karen Grime, Raymond Jerry Platt, City of Los Angeles Department of Water and Power and Does |
| 2:2007cv00316 |
| January 11, 2007 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Western Division - Los Angeles Office |
| Los Angeles |
| Stephen J. Hillman |
| A Howard Matz |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination) |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
371
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) by Judge Christina A. Snyder: The Court finds Defendant City of Los Angeles's Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction 362 appropriate for decision without oral argument. The hearing date of 4/5/2010, is hereby vacated, and the matter is hereby taken under submission. The Court DENIES the City's motion to dismiss. Court Reporter: Not Present. (gk)
|
|
Filing
240
MINUTES OF Motion Hearing held before Judge Christina A. Snyder: the Court DENIES Plaintiff's Appeal and/or Notice of Motion and Motion for Review and Reconsideration of Pretrial, Non-Dispositive Ruling of Magistrate Re: Sanctions Motions 229 , and orders that Barry pay sanctions at the rate of $500 per month until paid, commencing 11/10/2008. Court Reporter: Laura Elias. (gk)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
