John Okiyefa v. Derrel G Adams
Petitioner: John Okiyefa
Respondent: Derrel G Adams
Case Number: 2:2007cv00898
Filed: February 7, 2007
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Office: Western Division - Los Angeles Office
County: Kings
Presiding Judge: Victor B. Kenton
Presiding Judge: James V. Selna
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 7, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 102 JUDGMENT by Judge James V. Selna, related to R&R Adopting Report and Recommendations 101 . IT IS ADJUDGED that the Petition is dismissed with prejudice. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated) (esa)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: John Okiyefa v. Derrel G Adams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: John Okiyefa
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Derrel G Adams
Represented By: Jonathan J Kline
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?