Palmer Sixth Street Properties L P et al v. Los Angeles City of et al
| Geoffrey Palmer and Palmer Sixth Street Properties L P |
| Los Angeles City of and Does |
| 2:2007cv01346 |
| February 28, 2007 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Western Division - Los Angeles Office |
| Los Angeles |
| Fernando M. Olguin |
| Maryland Unassigned |
| Condemnation |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1358 Land Condemnation |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
40
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) by Judge Christina A. Snyder: After carefully considering the arguments set forth by both parties, the Court finds and concludes as follows as to Defendant City of Los Angeles' Motion to Dismiss, or in the Alternative, Moti on to Stay Case Based on Pullman Abstention Doctrine 31 . The Court GRANTS in part defendant's motion to dismiss and dismisses without prejudice plaintiffs' claim (1) for relief. The Court DENIES defendant's motion to dismiss plaintif fs' remaining claims as moot because the Court GRANTS defendant's motion to stay the instant action pending resolution of the similar proceeding in the Los Angeles County Superior Court. The case shall be removed from the Court's active case list, and the parties shall file a joint status report advising the Court of the status of the state action every 120 days. Court Reporter: Not Present. (gk)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
