Matthew S Wimberly v. Michael J Astrue

Justia Dockets & Filings Ninth Circuit California Central District Matthew S Wimberly v. Michael J Astrue

Matthew S Wimberly v. Michael J Astrue

Plaintiff:	Matthew S Wimberly
Defendant:	Michael J Astrue
Case Number:	2:2007cv01952
Filed:	March 26, 2007
Court:	US District Court for the Central District of California
Office:	Western Division - Los Angeles Office
County:	Los Angeles
Presiding Judge:	Andrew J. Guilford
Presiding Judge:	Jacqueline Chooljian
Nature of Suit:	Social Security: SSID Tit. XIV
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
January 7, 2009	Filing 23 ORDER AWARDING EAJA FEES by Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Chooljian. Fees awarded to plaintiff in the amount of $ 2200.00. (kca)
September 25, 2008	Filing 20 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER OF REMAND by Magistrate Judge Jacqueline ChooljianThis matter is before the Court on the parties cross motions for summaryjudgment, respectively (Plaintiffs Motion) and (Defendants Motion). TheCourt has taken both motions under submission without oral argument. For the foregoing reasons, the decision of the Commissioner of Social Security is reversed in part, and this matter is remanded for further administrativeaction consistent with this Opinion. LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY. (SEE ATTACHED ORDER FOR FURTHER DETAILDS) (es)

Date Filed

Document Text

January 7, 2009

Filing 23 ORDER AWARDING EAJA FEES by Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Chooljian. Fees awarded to plaintiff in the amount of $ 2200.00. (kca)

September 25, 2008

Filing 20 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER OF REMAND by Magistrate Judge Jacqueline ChooljianThis matter is before the Court on the parties cross motions for summaryjudgment, respectively (Plaintiffs Motion) and (Defendants Motion). TheCourt has taken both motions under submission without oral argument. For the foregoing reasons, the decision of the Commissioner of Social Security is reversed in part, and this matter is remanded for further administrativeaction consistent with this Opinion. LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY. (SEE ATTACHED ORDER FOR FURTHER DETAILDS) (es)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Matthew S Wimberly v. Michael J Astrue
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Michael J Astrue
Represented By:	Cedina M Kim
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Matthew S Wimberly
Represented By:	Marc V Kalagian
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?