Carthell David Jeys v. A Ahkavan
Plaintiff: Carthell David Jeys
Defendant: A Ahkavan
Case Number: 2:2007cv02079
Filed: March 29, 2007
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Office: Western Division - Los Angeles Office
County: San Luis Obispo
Presiding Judge: Unassigned
Presiding Judge: Duty Magistrate Judge
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 29, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 33 JUDGMENT by Judge Dolly M. Gee, IT IS ADJUDGED that this action is dismissed without prejudice. Related to: R&R Adopting Report and Recommendations, 32 , Complaint (Prisoner Civil Rights) 4 (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (lmh)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Carthell David Jeys v. A Ahkavan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Carthell David Jeys
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: A Ahkavan
Represented By: Randall R Murphy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?