Summit Media, LLC v. City of Los Angeles et al
| Summit Media, LLC |
| Los Angeles Department of Building and Safety and City of Los Angeles |
| Summit Media, LLC |
| Rockard John Delgadillo |
| Attorney Settlement Officer |
| CBS Outdoor Inc, City of Los Angeles and Los Angeles Department of Building and Safety |
| CBS Outdoor Inc and Clear Channel Outdoor, Inc |
| 2:2007cv02649 |
| November 5, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Western Division - Los Angeles Office |
| Ronald S.W. Lew |
| Andrew J. Wistrich |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
270
ORDER DISMISSING ACTION by Judge Ronald S.W. Lew: SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS. Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (jre) (Main Document 270 replaced on 11/16/2012) (jre).
|
|
Filing
268
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge Ronald S.W. Lew: The Court orders Plaintiff to show cause, in writing, on or beforeNovember 13, 2012, by 4:00 p.m., as to why this matter should not be dismissed for lack of prosecutio n. NO ORAL ARGUMENT WILL BE HEARD AND APPEARANCES ARE NOTNECESSARY on this matter unless ordered by the Court. The Order to Show Cause will stand submitted upon the filing of the proper response. Failure to timelyrespond will result in the dismissal of this action. (jre)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
