Maria Barrios v. Diamond Contract Services Inc

Justia Dockets & Filings Ninth Circuit California Central District Maria Barrios v. Diamond Contract Services Inc

Maria Barrios v. Diamond Contract Services Inc

Plaintiff:	Maria Barrios
Defendant:	Diamond Contract Services Inc
Case Number:	2:2007cv03500
Filed:	May 30, 2007
Court:	US District Court for the Central District of California
Office:	Western Division - Los Angeles Office
County:	Los Angeles
Presiding Judge:	Fernando M. Olguin
Presiding Judge:	Edward Rafeedie
Nature of Suit:	Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
December 20, 2012	Filing 138 FINAL JUDGMENT by Judge Consuelo B. Marshall IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED THAT: Defendant Diamond Contract Services, Inc. ("Defendant") shall pay Plaintiff Maria Barrios ("Plaintiff") reasonable attorneys' fees in the amount of $231,235 and litigation costs in the amount of $28,047.69; Defendant shall pay Plaintiff the jury verdict amount of $8,500 awarded to her for lost wages and compensatory damages 72 ; Defendant shall pay Plaintiff 9;s appellate attorneys' fees in the amount of $50,618 awarded by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit [U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, [Docket No. 43]; 5. Defendant shall pay Plaintiff the Ninth Circuit Clerks taxe d costs inthe amount of $512.41 for Plaintiff's appeal [U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, Docket No. 38]; 6. Accordingly, Final Judgment is hereby entered in favor of Plaintiff Maria Barrios and against Defendant Diamond Contract Services, Inc. in the total amount of $318,913.09; This Final Judgment shall take effect immediately upon its entry; There being no just reason for delay, pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rules 54 and 58(b), the Clerk is ordered to enter this Final Judgment forthwith and without further notice; and IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED thatthis Court shall retain jurisdiction of this matter for the purposes of enforcing the terms of this Final Judgment and the Courts prior Order requiring Defendant to pay the total amount due by November 26, 2012. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (lom)
November 12, 2008	Filing 72 JUDGMENT by Judge Manuel L. Real, in favor of Maria Barrios against Diamond Contract Services Inc: JUDGMENT IS HEREBY ENTERED in favor of Plaintiff Maria Barrios and against Defendant Diamond Contract Services, Inc., in the total amount of $8,500.00. Plaintiff is the prevailing party and is to recover her costs and attorneys fees pursuant to applicable laws. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (ake)

Date Filed

Document Text

December 20, 2012

Filing 138 FINAL JUDGMENT by Judge Consuelo B. Marshall IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED THAT: Defendant Diamond Contract Services, Inc. ("Defendant") shall pay Plaintiff Maria Barrios ("Plaintiff") reasonable attorneys' fees in the amount of $231,235 and litigation costs in the amount of $28,047.69; Defendant shall pay Plaintiff the jury verdict amount of $8,500 awarded to her for lost wages and compensatory damages 72 ; Defendant shall pay Plaintiff 9;s appellate attorneys' fees in the amount of $50,618 awarded by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit [U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, [Docket No. 43]; 5. Defendant shall pay Plaintiff the Ninth Circuit Clerks taxe d costs inthe amount of $512.41 for Plaintiff's appeal [U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, Docket No. 38]; 6. Accordingly, Final Judgment is hereby entered in favor of Plaintiff Maria Barrios and against Defendant Diamond Contract Services, Inc. in the total amount of $318,913.09; This Final Judgment shall take effect immediately upon its entry; There being no just reason for delay, pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rules 54 and 58(b), the Clerk is ordered to enter this Final Judgment forthwith and without further notice; and IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED thatthis Court shall retain jurisdiction of this matter for the purposes of enforcing the terms of this Final Judgment and the Courts prior Order requiring Defendant to pay the total amount due by November 26, 2012. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (lom)

November 12, 2008

Filing 72 JUDGMENT by Judge Manuel L. Real, in favor of Maria Barrios against Diamond Contract Services Inc: JUDGMENT IS HEREBY ENTERED in favor of Plaintiff Maria Barrios and against Defendant Diamond Contract Services, Inc., in the total amount of $8,500.00. Plaintiff is the prevailing party and is to recover her costs and attorneys fees pursuant to applicable laws. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (ake)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Maria Barrios v. Diamond Contract Services Inc
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Maria Barrios
Represented By:	Chaim Jacob Woolf
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Diamond Contract Services Inc
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?