John Wesley Davis v. Robert Horel
Plaintiff: John Wesley Davis
Respondent: Robert Horel
Case Number: 2:2007cv03610
Filed: June 4, 2007
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Office: Western Division - Los Angeles Office
County: Del Norte
Presiding Judge: Stephen G. Larson
Presiding Judge: Jennifer T. Lum
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 8, 2008 Opinion or Order Filing 40 JUDGMENT by Judge Stephen G. Larson, Related to: R&R Adopting Report and Recommendations, 39 (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). IT IS HEREBY ADJUDGED that the First Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is denied and this action is dismissed with prejudice. (rp)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: John Wesley Davis v. Robert Horel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: John Wesley Davis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Robert Horel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?