L. F. P. Inc et al v. Cafepress.com, Inc et al
L. F. P. Inc, LFP IP, LLC and LFP Apparel, LLC |
Cafepress.com, Inc and DOES |
2:2007cv04401 |
July 6, 2007 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Western Division - Los Angeles Office |
Los Angeles |
Philip S. Gutierrez |
Andrew J. Wistrich |
Trademark |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1051 Trademark Infringement |
Both |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing
8
ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez: Scheduling Conference set for 11/5/2007 02:00 PM before Judge Philip S. Gutierrez. Counsel are ordered to file a joint statement providing a brief factual summary of the case. Parties are reminded of their obligation to disclose information and confer on a discovery plan, not later than 21 days prior to the scheduling conference, and to file a joint statement with the Court not later than 14 days after they confer. (gk)
|
Filing
7
STANDING ORDER REGARDING NEWLY ASSIGNED CASES by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez: This action has been assigned to the calendar of Judge Philip S. Gutierrez. All counsel are hereby ordered to familiarize themselves with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, particularly Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 16, 26, and the Local Rules of the Central District of California, this Court's Order for Jury Trial, and this Court's Order for Court Trial. See document for details. (gk)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.