Amber Anderson et al v. Sprint Nextel Corporation et al
| Serena Hawkins, Amber Anderson, Natasha Wilson and Marcel Edwards |
| Sprint Nextel Corporation and DOES |
| 2:2007cv04480 |
| July 11, 2007 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Western Division - Los Angeles Office |
| Los Angeles |
| Frederick F. Mumm |
| Stephen V. Wilson |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
112
MODIFIED FINAL JUDGMENT by Judge Stephen V. Wilson: Pursuant to the terms of the Stipulation of Settlement, in exchange for the Class Members agreeing to release the Released Claims, as modified by the Joint Response, Defendants agreed to pay to the Class Members a maximum payment of $2,800,000.00, which is inclusive of attorneys fees to Class Counsel in the total amount of $372,601.50. The Court finds that the Settlement is fair, reasonable and adequate in all respects. The Court furt her finds that the Settlement was made in good faith, negotiated at arms-length and represents the best interests of the Parties and the absent Class Members. Accordingly, the Court orders the parties to consummate the Settlement in accordance with t he terms of the Stipulation of Settlement, as modified by the Joint Response. The Court finds that Class Counsel, having conferred a benefit on absent Class Members and having expended efforts to secure compensation to the Class, are entitled to a fe e, and accordingly, the Court awards attorneys fees to Class Counsel in the total amount of $372,601.50, and litigation costs of $13,136.97. [6/30/10 Order, Docket No. 110.] These amounts are payable directly by Defendants as set forth in t he Stipulation of Settlement. The Court further approves the payment of claims administration fees to Rust Consulting in the amount of $45,547.00. In release of Plaintiffs claim under California Labor Code section 2698, et seq., the Labor Code P rivate Attorneys General Act of 2004, the Parties allocated $30,000.00 as PAGA penalties. The Court finds that this amount is fair and reasonable and will fully satisfy the Parties obligation under section 2698, et seq. to pay any amounts attrib utable to PAGA penalties. For the reasons set forth in the Courts Order granting final approval of the Settlement entered on April 12, 2010, and Order Granting-in-Part and Denying-in-Part Motion For Approval of Fees, Costs, and Enhancement dated June 30, 2010, the Court approves the settlement, attorneys fees, expenses, and costs as set forth herein. Service has been effected as required by 28 U.S.C. § 1715 and the only objection is overruled.(MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (ir)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
