Leonard Radlauer v. Cedars-Sinai Medical Center et al
| Leonard Radlauer |
| Shaun S Daneshrad, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, David S Ramin and Ann Meyer |
| 2:2007cv05428 |
| August 20, 2007 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Western Division - Los Angeles Office |
| XX US, Outside California |
| Gary A. Feess |
| Andrew J. Wistrich |
| Personal Inj. Med. Malpractice |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Medical Malpractice |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
115
JUDGMENT, IT IS ADJUDGED: Plaintiff, Leonard Radlauer, take nothing from Defendant, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, on any claim against Defendant in this matter. Defendant, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, recover its costs of suit against Plaintiff, Leonard Radlauer, as taxed by the clerk. All relief not expressly granted is denied by Judge Gary A. Feess, in favor of Cedars-Sinai Medical Center against Leonard Radlauer (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (bp)
|
|
Filing
88
JUDGMENT by Judge Gary A. Feess, in favor of defendants Ann Meyer, David S Ramin against plaintiff Leonard Radlauer. Related to MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Entire Action 44 , MOTION for Summary Judgment as to entire action 31 . JUDGMENT IS HEREBY ENTERED, pursuant to Rule 54(b), FRCP infavor of defendant, DAVID S. RAMIN, M.D., and ANN MEYER, M.D., andagainst plaintiff, LEONARD RADLAUER. Costs to be determined upon requestof defendants DAVID S. RAMIN, M.D., and ANN MEYER, M.D. (rrey)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
