Diamond Game Enterprises v. Jackpot Promotions et al
| Diamond Game Enterprises |
| Jackpot Promotions, Rivers Fennell, David Petty and Joseph Stevenson |
| 2:2007cv06239 |
| September 26, 2007 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Western Division - Los Angeles Office |
| Los Angeles |
| Margaret M. Morrow |
| Margaret A. Nagle |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
42
JUDGMENT by Judge John F. Walter: IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED THAT DGE has proven all of the elements of all of its claims alleged in the Complaint against Defendants. Accordingly, DGE is hereby declared the prevailing party on all of its cla ims against Defendants and judgment should be and hereby is entered in favor of DGE and against Defendants on the merits on all claims for relief alleged in DGE's Complaint. FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED THAT DGE shall recover from Defen dants, and each of them, damages in the total amount of $237,718.00. FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED THAT DGE shall additionally recover from Defendants, and each of them, its costs of suit incurred herein in the sum of ___. FURTHER ORDERE D, ADJUDGED AND DECREED THAT, pursuant to California Civil Code § 3289, DGE shall additionally recover from Defendants, and each of them, statutory prejudgment interest of 10% per annum on $237,718.00 in the amount of $53,797.69. FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the total amount of this Judgment shall bear post-judgment interest of $10.00 per day pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1961(a) from the date of the entry of this Judgment until it is satisfied in full. Related to: MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Plaintiff's sole cause of action 35 . (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (jp)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
