Richard Schoenfeld et al v. John Marshall

Justia Dockets & Filings Ninth Circuit California Central District Richard Schoenfeld et al v. John Marshall

Richard Schoenfeld et al v. John Marshall

Petitioner:	Richard Schoenfeld
Respondent:	John Marshall
Case Number:	2:2007cv07447
Filed:	November 14, 2007
Court:	US District Court for the Central District of California
Office:	Western Division - Los Angeles Office
County:	Santa Clara
Presiding Judge:	Valerie Baker Fairbank
Presiding Judge:	John Charles Rayburn
Nature of Suit:	Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
September 29, 2010	Filing 84 JUDGMENT by Judge Valerie Baker Fairbank. It is Adjudged that the Petition is conditionally granted. within 90 days of the entry of Judgment herein, or such further time as reasonably allowed under state law, Respondent shall release Petitioner on p arole unless, within that period of time, the California Board of Parole Hearings either: (1) sets a release date for Petitioner; or (2) holds a new parole suitability hearing for Petitioner and renders a decision in conformity with the requirements of due process, consistent with the law discussed in the Revised Report and Recommendation (to the extent the California Board of Parole Hearings has not previously done (1) or (2)). (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (sp)

Date Filed

Document Text

September 29, 2010

Filing 84 JUDGMENT by Judge Valerie Baker Fairbank. It is Adjudged that the Petition is conditionally granted. within 90 days of the entry of Judgment herein, or such further time as reasonably allowed under state law, Respondent shall release Petitioner on p arole unless, within that period of time, the California Board of Parole Hearings either: (1) sets a release date for Petitioner; or (2) holds a new parole suitability hearing for Petitioner and renders a decision in conformity with the requirements of due process, consistent with the law discussed in the Revised Report and Recommendation (to the extent the California Board of Parole Hearings has not previously done (1) or (2)). (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (sp)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Richard Schoenfeld et al v. John Marshall
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Richard Schoenfeld
Represented By:	Steven M Defilippis
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: John Marshall
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?