Mintie Corporation v. Nor E First Response Inc

Justia Dockets & Filings Ninth Circuit California Central District Mintie Corporation v. Nor E First Response Inc

Mintie Corporation v. Nor E First Response Inc

Plaintiff:	Mintie Corporation
Defendant:	Nor E First Response Inc
Case Number:	2:2007cv08189
Filed:	December 17, 2007
Court:	US District Court for the Central District of California
Office:	Western Division - Los Angeles Office
County:	Los Angeles
Presiding Judge:	Jacqueline Chooljian
Presiding Judge:	Dale S. Fischer
Nature of Suit:	Patent
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1338 Patent Infringement
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
September 25, 2008	Filing 13 CONSENT JUDGMENT by Judge Dale S. Fischer: Pursuant to the Stipulation 12 , this Court enters Judgment as follows: 1) Defendant NorE First Reponse Inc has, prior to the filing of this Complaint, ceased manufacture and sael of the product accused of infringing the patent. 2) Nor E in favor of Mintie Corporation against NorE shall not make, use, sell or offer for sale the product that infringes the patent. 3) Plaintiff Mintie hereby dismisses all claims with prejudice, with each party to bear its own attorneys' fees and costs, subject to the terms of a separate settlement agreement. 4) The Court shall retain jurisdiction to enforce the terms of this Consent Judgment. (MD JS-6. Case Terminated ) (mg)

Date Filed

Document Text

September 25, 2008

Filing 13 CONSENT JUDGMENT by Judge Dale S. Fischer: Pursuant to the Stipulation 12 , this Court enters Judgment as follows: 1) Defendant NorE First Reponse Inc has, prior to the filing of this Complaint, ceased manufacture and sael of the product accused of infringing the patent. 2) Nor E in favor of Mintie Corporation against NorE shall not make, use, sell or offer for sale the product that infringes the patent. 3) Plaintiff Mintie hereby dismisses all claims with prejudice, with each party to bear its own attorneys' fees and costs, subject to the terms of a separate settlement agreement. 4) The Court shall retain jurisdiction to enforce the terms of this Consent Judgment. (MD JS-6. Case Terminated ) (mg)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Mintie Corporation v. Nor E First Response Inc
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Nor E First Response Inc
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Mintie Corporation
Represented By:	Brian K Brookey
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?