Best Containers Express Co. v. Sinotrans Container Lines Co Ltd et al
Best Containers Express Co. |
DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, Sinotrans Container Lines Co Ltd and Sinotrans Shipping Agency North America Inc |
2:2008cv00063 |
January 4, 2008 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Western Division - Los Angeles Office |
Los Angeles |
Rosalyn M Chapman |
George H King |
Contract: Marine |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 5, 2008. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 ORDER RE DISMISSAL by Judge George H. King, re Stipulation to Dismiss Case #11 : Pursuant to the parties' Stipulation for Dismissal with Prejudice, IT IS ORDERED that: The entire case shall be dismissed with prejudice and each party bears its own costs and fees. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (bm) |
Filing 11 STIPULATION to Dismiss Case pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(ii) filed by Plaintiff Best Containers Express Co.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Re Dismissal)(Lee, Sook) |
Filing 10 ORDER Vacating Scheduling Conference by Judge George H. King: IT IS ORDERED that: The Scheduling Conference, currently scheduled for April 7, 2008, shall be vacated and a stipulation for dismissal shall be filed on or before April 30, 2008. (es) |
Filing 9 NOTICE of Settlement and Request to Vacate Scheduling Conference filed by Plaintiff Best Containers Express Co.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Lee, Sook) |
Filing 8 NOTICE of Settlement and request to vacate scheduling conference filed by Plaintiff Best Containers Express Co.. (Lee, Sook) |
Filing 7 ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge George H. King: Scheduling Conference set for 4/7/2008 01:30 PM. Parties' Planning Meeting Pursuant to Rule 26(f) by no later than March 13, 2008. Report of Parties' Planning Meeting by no later than March 24, 2008. Counsel shall discuss this subject specifically with his/her client (see order for further details). (bm) |
Filing 6 NOTICE OF CLERICAL ERROR: Due to clerical error the Case has been reassigned from Judge R. Gary Klausner to Judge George H. King for all further proceedings. The case will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge CV 08-00063 GHK (RCx). (et) |
Filing 5 ORDER RE: CASE MANAGEMENT by Judge George H. King, (bp) |
Filing 4 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE filed by Defendants Sinotrans Container Lines Co Ltd, Sinotrans Shipping Agency North America Inc, re Notice of Removal, #1 served on 1/4/2008. (car) Additional attachment(s) added on 1/15/2008 (lra, ). |
Filing 3 ANSWER TO COMPLAINT re Notice of Removal, #1 filed by Defendants Sinotrans Container Lines Co Ltd, Sinotrans Shipping Agency North America Inc.(car) Additional attachment(s) added on 1/15/2008 (lra, ). |
Filing 2 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendants Sinotrans Container Lines Co Ltd, Sinotrans Shipping Agency North America Inc. (car) Additional attachment(s) added on 1/15/2008 (lra, ). |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles Superior Court, case number NC 050633 with Conformed copy of summons and complaint. Case assigned to Judge R. Gary Klausner, Discovery to Magistrate Judge Rosalyn M Chapman. (Filing fee $ 350 PAID), filed by Defendant Sinotrans Container Lines Co Ltd, Sinotrans Shipping Agency North America Inc.(car) Additional attachment(s) added on 1/11/2008 (lra, ). |
FAX number for Attorney Dena S Aghabeg, Alan Nakazawa is (562) 951-8668. (car) |
FAX number for Attorney Sook H Lee is (213) 382-1919. (car) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.