Dannez Hunter v. U. S. Dept. of Education et al
| Dannez Hunter |
| U.S. Dept. of Treasury, John Does, U.S. Attorney General, U. S. Dept. of Education, Granite State Mgmt. & Resource, Susie Mae and Greater Lakes Higher Education Corp. |
| 2:2008cv00129 |
| January 9, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Western Division - Los Angeles Office |
| Los Angeles |
| Alicemarie H. Stotler |
| Fernando M. Olguin |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
139
MINUTES OF IN CHAMBERS ORDER held before Judge Alicemarie H. Stotler (1) DISCHARGING THE COURTS JANUARY 14, 2009, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE AND DISMISSING ACTION WITH PREJUDICE; AND (2)DENYING AS MOOT PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR LODGEMENT OF DOCUMENTS 31 . See order for details. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (smi)
|
|
Filing
132
MINUTES OF IN CHAMBERS ORDER by Judge Alicemarie H. Stotler: (1) DISCHARGING THE COURT'S DECEMBER 29, 2008, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE 128 ; (2) VACATING THE FEBRUARY 2, 2009, RULE 26(f) REPORT FILING DEADLINE; AND (3) ORDERING PLAINTIFF TO SHOW CAUSE WHY ACTION SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED: (See document for further details.) It is hereby ordered that plaintiff show cause within twenty days of the date of this Order why this case should not be dismissed for failure to diligently prosecute. Failure to timely comply with this Ordershall result in the dismissal of the individually-named defendants and, consequently, this action. The Clerk shall serve this minute order on all parties in this action. (rla)
|
|
Filing
124
ORDER by Judge Alicemarie H. Stotler, denying MOTION for Reconsideration TO AMEND the COMPLAINT 92 : Because the Court does not need to reach defendants' alternative arguments regarding the futility of plaintiffs proposed amendments, defendants' request for judicial notice is declined at this time. IT IS SO ORDERED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall serve a copy of this Order on all parties in this action. (rla)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
