Michelle Schroeder v. Los Angeles County USC Medical Center et al
| Michelle Schroeder |
| Oscar A Romero, Dora Magana, Los Angeles County USC Medical Center, USC Medical Center, County of Los Angeles, Los Angeles County Department of Health Services, County of Los Angeles Department of Public Health, Department of Health and Human Services, Ignacio Amezcua, Susanna Z Krol, Scott Leary, United States of America, United States of America, Department of Health and Human Services and DOES |
| 2:2008cv00264 |
| January 16, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Western Division - Los Angeles Office |
| XX US, Outside California |
| Philip S. Gutierrez |
| Carolyn Turchin |
| Personal Inj. Med. Malpractice |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Medical Malpractice |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
61
ORDER OF DISMISSAL by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:1. Plaintiffs action is dismissed in its entirety with respect to defendantUnited States of America and defendant County of Los Angeles; 2. The Court shall to retain jurisdict ion pending completion of the terms of settlements. 3. In the event that the Board of Supervisors for the County of Los Angeles rejects or fails to approve the settlement between the Plaintiff and the County of Los Angeles, the Court will reopen this case; and 4. All parties shall bear their own fees, expenses, and costs of suit. (ca)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
