Dion Starr v. County of Los Angeles et al
| Dion Starr |
| Does, Leroy Baca, Garivay Bugarin, County of Los Angeles, Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department and Rodriguez |
| 2:2008cv00508 |
| January 25, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Western Division - Los Angeles Office |
| Los Angeles |
| George H Wu |
| Duty Magistrate Judge |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
353
PROTECTIVE ORDER ON DEFENDANTS' PRODUCTION OF THE PERSONNEL PERFORMANCE INDEXES OF CERTAIN DEFENDANTS by Magistrate Judge Stephen J. Hillman. **[NOTE CHANGES MADE BY THE COURT] After having reviewed the underlying source documents for the Subject PPi in-camera and the Stipulation for Entry of Protective Order, the Court hereby order the production of the Subject PPis, subject to the following terms. 351 [SEE ORDER FOR FURTHER DETAILS] (gr)
|
|
Filing
70
JUDGMENT by Judge George H Wu, (1) The Court's ruling on SHERIFF LEE BACA's Motion to Dismiss and Motion to Strike plaintiff's Third Amended Complaint shall constitute a final judgment as to SHERIFF BACA pursuant to Rule 54(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, whereas: (2) Plaintiff DION STARR shall take nothing against defendant SHERIFF LEE BACA; and (3) Defendant SHERIFF LEE BACA shall have judgment against plaintiff DION STARR. (pj)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
