Scott James Craft v. D K Sisto

Scott James Craft v. D K Sisto

Petitioner:	Scott James Craft
Respondent:	D K Sisto
Case Number:	2:2008cv01179
Filed:	February 21, 2008
Court:	US District Court for the Central District of California
Office:	Western Division - Los Angeles Office
County:	Solano
Presiding Judge:	Valerie Baker Fairbank
Presiding Judge:	Jeffrey W. Johnson
Nature of Suit:	Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
November 18, 2010	Filing 80 JUDGMENT by Judge Valerie Baker Fairbank, In accordance with the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge filed concurrently herewith, IT IS HEREBY ADJUDGED that this action is dismissed with prejudice. 79 (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (es)
December 9, 2009	Filing 36 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY DEFAULT SHOULD NOT BE ENTERED PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 55(a) by Magistrate Judge John E. McDermott: Accordingly, defendants Corbin and Davis are ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE why their default should not be entered for failure to respond to the TAC. Defendants each may file a written response to the Order to Show Cause or may file an Answer to the TAC within twenty (20) days of the date of this Order. If defendant Corbin or Davis fails to respond to this Order to Show Cause, the clerk will enter defendants default and plaintiff may proceed to seek default judgment pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 54 and 55.1. The Clerk is directed to serve a copy of this Order to Show Cause upon plaintiff andall defendants who have been served with the TAC. IT IS SO ORDERED. SEE ORDER FOR FURTHER DETAILS (ca)

Date Filed

Document Text

November 18, 2010

Filing 80 JUDGMENT by Judge Valerie Baker Fairbank, In accordance with the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge filed concurrently herewith, IT IS HEREBY ADJUDGED that this action is dismissed with prejudice. 79 (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (es)

December 9, 2009

Filing 36 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY DEFAULT SHOULD NOT BE ENTERED PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 55(a) by Magistrate Judge John E. McDermott: Accordingly, defendants Corbin and Davis are ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE why their default should not be entered for failure to respond to the TAC. Defendants each may file a written response to the Order to Show Cause or may file an Answer to the TAC within twenty (20) days of the date of this Order. If defendant Corbin or Davis fails to respond to this Order to Show Cause, the clerk will enter defendants default and plaintiff may proceed to seek default judgment pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 54 and 55.1. The Clerk is directed to serve a copy of this Order to Show Cause upon plaintiff andall defendants who have been served with the TAC. IT IS SO ORDERED. **SEE ORDER FOR FURTHER DETAILS** (ca)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Scott James Craft v. D K Sisto
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Scott James Craft
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: D K Sisto
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?