Coach Services, Inc. v. Glo International, Inc. et al
||Coach Services, Inc.
||Brian Bang, DOES and Glo International, Inc.
||March 17, 2008
||US District Court for the Central District of California
||Western Division - Los Angeles Office
||XX US, Outside California
||Paul L. Abrams
||Valerie Baker Fairbank
|Nature of Suit:
|Cause of Action:
||15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
|Jury Demanded By:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|September 21, 2009
ORDER GRANTING CONSENT JUDGMENT AND VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL OF DEFENDANTS GLO International Inc., Brian Bang, La Familia, Inc., DBA Dollar Plus, Chris Parks, Beloge Handbags, Youngstar, Hanmi Mart, J.C. Bags Co., Max 969, Inc., B&B Handbags, Inc., Eli Co llections, Inc., Fashion City Inc., John Lee, Sense Trading Four Jay, K & S Trading Co., and CJ Handbags by Judge Valerie Baker Fairbank. Plaintiff and Defendants have entered into a Settlement Agreement and Mutual Release as to the claims in the abo ve referenced matter. Defendants, having agreed to consent to the below terms. This Court has jurisdiction over the parties to this Final Judgment and has jurisdiction over the subject matter hereof pursuant to 15 USC section 1121. The Settling Defen dants and their agents, servants, employees and all persons in active concert and participation with it who receive actual notice of this Final Judgment are hereby permanently restrained and enjoined. (See attached Order for further information). Related to: Stipulation 45 . (jp)
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?