United States Of America et al v. Kinetic Concepts, Inc.
| Steven J. Hartpence |
| KCI-USA Inc. and Kinetic Concepts, Inc. |
| U.S. DOJ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| 2:2008cv01885 |
| February 24, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Western Division - Los Angeles Office |
| George H. King |
| Alicia G. Rosenberg |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 31 U.S.C. ยง 3729 False Claims Act |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
521
JUDGMENT 518 by Judge Christina A. Snyder: Judgment is entered in favorof Defendants, that Plaintiff Steven J. Hartpence take nothing from Defendants, that the action be dismissed with prejudice on the merits, and that Defendants recover their costs of suit from Steven J. Hartpence pursuant to a bill of costs filed in accordance with 28 USC 1920, FRCP 54 and Local Rule 54. (lc)
|
|
Filing
283
STIPULATED HIPAA QUALIFIED PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg. re Stipulation for Protective Order 282 . (See Order for Further Details) (kl)
|
|
Filing
106
JUDGMENT by Judge George H. King: Pursuant to the Court's January 30, 2012 Order, IT IS HEREBY ADJUDGED that Plaintiff Steven J. Hartpence's ("Plaintiff") claims against Defendants Kinetic Concepts, Inc. and KCI-USA, Inc. are DISMISSED with prejudice. Plaintiff shall take nothing by this Complaint. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (bm)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
