Scientific Weight Loss, LLC et al v. U.S. Medical Care Holdings, LLC et al
| Irving Posalski, M.D., Scientific Weight Loss, LLC, Larry Brahim and Anthony Podell |
| Smart for Life-Manhattan, LLC, Smart for Life-Jupiter, LLC, U.S. Medical Care Holdings, LLC, U.S. Medical Care Wellington, LLC, Lavi Enterprises, LLC, Doctors Nutrition, LLC, Doctors Scientific Organica, LLC, Levy Investment Holdings, LLC, Lawee Enterprises, LLC, Tollev Realties, LLC, Smart For Life Jacksonville, LLC, Smart for Life Miami, LLC, Smart for Life New Port Richey, LLC, Smart for Life New York, LLC, Smart for Life-Port St. Lucie, LLC, Smart for Life South Beach, LLC, Medical Care, Inc., Oyster Management Services LTD., Sasson E. Moulavi and Richard Kayne |
| 2:2008cv02852 |
| May 1, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Western Division - Los Angeles Office |
| Los Angeles |
| Philip S. Gutierrez |
| Frederick F. Mumm |
| Trademark |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act) |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
227
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez: Proceedings: Order Granting Defendants' Motion for Declaration of Prevailing Party and Award for Attorney Fees 202 . The Court GRANTS the motion for attorneys' fees, pendingsubmission of the additional briefing and evidence as described above. Defendants shall submit their opening brief by July 27, 2009. Plaintiffs's opposition is due by August 3, 2009. Defendants may file a reply brief no later than August 10, 2009. The hearing is set for August 17, 2009. (mg)
|
|
Filing
197
MINUTES OF IN CHAMBERS ORDER held before Judge Philip S. Gutierrez re ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS' APPLICATION FOR A TRO 171 and PLAINTIFFS' EX PARTE MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT 169 : Accordingly, Plaintiff's ex p arte application for leave to file the Second Amended Complaint is DENIED. Plaintiffs' counsel are hereby ordered to show cause why they should not be sanctioned $1,000.00 for filing of multiple frivolous motions. For the foregoing reasons, Plaintiffs' motions are DENIED. Counsel are ordered to submit their response to the order to show cause regarding sanctions within ten days (see document for further details) (bm) Modified on 10/30/2008 (bm).
|
|
Filing
156
MINUTES: (In Chambers) Order DENYING Plaintiff's Motion for a Preliminary Injunction 89 IT IS SO ORDERED by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez. (ir)
|
|
Filing
146
MINUTES: (In Chambers) Order DENYING Plaintiffs' Application for a Temporary Restraining order 117 IT IS SO ORDERED by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez (ir)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
