Paramount Pictures Corporation v. Evan Shapiro et al
| Paramount Pictures Corporation |
| Evan Shapiro, Rachel Shapiro and Does |
| 2:2008cv03145 |
| May 13, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Western Division - Los Angeles Office |
| Los Angeles |
| Victor B. Kenton |
| Consuelo B. Marshall |
| Copyright |
| 17 U.S.C. ยง 101 Copyright Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
8
CONSENT DECREE AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION by Judge Consuelo B. Marshall. Defendants Evan Shapiro and Rachel Shapiro and their agents, servants, employees and all person in active concert and participation with them who receive actual notice of the Inj unction are hereby restrained and enjoined from Infringing plaintiff's Properties, etc. Each side shall bear its own fees and costs of suit. Except as provided herein, all claims alleged in the Complaint are dismissed with prejudice. This Court shall retain jurisdiction over the Defendants for the purpose of making further orders necessary or proper for the construction or modification of this consent decree and judgment; the enforcement hereof; the punishment of any violations hereof; and for the possible entry of a further Judgment Purusant to Stipulation in this action. Refer to document for details. ( MD JS-6. Case Terminated ) (lom)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
