IATSE Local 33 Section 401(k) Plan Board of Trustees v. Michael L. Bullock et al
Plaintiff: |
IATSE Local 33 Section 401(k) Plan Board of Trustees |
Defendant: |
Michael L Bullock, Securities America, Inc. and Massachusetts Financial Services Company |
Case Number: |
2:2008cv03949 |
Filed: |
June 17, 2008 |
Court: |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Office: |
Western Division - Los Angeles Office |
County: |
Los Angeles |
Presiding Judge: |
Matz |
Presiding Judge: |
Segal |
Nature of Suit: |
Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
Cause of Action: |
29 U.S.C. ยง 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits |
Jury Demanded By: |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Date Filed |
Document Text |
January 16, 2009 |
Filing
63
JUDGMENT by Judge A. Howard Mat re Stipulation for Judgment 62 . Good cause having been shown, the Court GRANTS FMS' Motion as follows: Plaintiff IATSE Local 33 Section 401(k) Plan Board of Trustees First through Fifth causes of action against Massachusetts Financial Services Company are dismissed with prejudice. Plaintiff Sixth through Eight causes of action against MFS are dismissed without prejudice. (jp)
|
November 5, 2008 |
Filing
57
MINUTES OF IN CHAMBERS before Judge A. Howard Matz: The Court GRANTS the MOTION to Dismiss 26 with prejudice in part and DENIES it in part. Specifically, the Court dismisses with prejudice the Complaint's first three ERISA claims, because they all depend on the allegation, now abandoned by Plaintiff, that MFS is a Plan fiduciary. The Court dismisses with prejudice the Complaint's fourth and fifth ERISA claims because they depend on the unsupportable allegation that MFS is a "par ty in interest." The Court holds that the state law claims are not completely preempted by ERISA because they do not fall within the scope of ERISAs civil enforcement provisions. In the absence of complete preemption, the Court has only suppleme ntal jurisdiction over the claims, and must consider the interests of economy, convenience and fairness to the parties, and comity, in deciding whether to exercise that jurisdiction. Having weighed those factors, the Court will not assert supplemental jurisdiction over the state law claims and dismisses them without prejudice (see document for further details). (jp)
|
October 3, 2008 |
Filing
47
MINUTES OF IN CHAMBERS ORDER held before Judge A. Howard Matz: On the Courts own motion, the Court hereby takes OFF-CALENDAR and UNDER SUBMISSION Defendant Securities America, Inc.s Motion to Compel Arbitration. The parties will be notified if a hearing is necessary. (smo)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?