Kent J. Klawer v. SMI Liquidating, Inc. et al
| Kent J. Klawer |
| Zeneca Holdings, Inc., Astrazeneca Pharmaceuticals LP, Astrazeneca PLC, SMI Liquidating, Inc. and AstraZeneca LP |
| 2:2008cv04991 |
| July 30, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Western Division - Los Angeles Office |
| Riverside |
| Lew |
| Wistrich |
| Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
165
JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL 164 by Judge Lawrence L Piersol: Based upon the Notice of Dismissal, Doc. 164 , it is hereby, ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the Plaintiff's Complaint and causes of action are hereby dismissed upon the merits, with prejudice, and with each party to pay their own costs and attorney's fees. (jre)
|
|
Filing
158
ORDER DISMISSING Action by Virtue of Settlement by Judge Lawrence L Piersol, re Notice of Settlement 157 : The Court having been advised by the parties that the above-entitled action has been settled; IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that this action is dismissed without prejudice to the right, upon good cause shown within 60 days, to reopen this action if settlement is not consummated. Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (smo)
|
|
Filing
51
PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Andrew J. Wistrich. See document for details. (yb)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
