Sky Tag, Inc. et al v. City of Los Angeles
| Sky Tag, Inc., West Hollywood Inc., Sunset & Vine, Inc., Sky Creative Services, Inc., Sky Posters Inc. and Sky Tag West, Inc. |
| City of Los Angeles |
| 2:2008cv05434 |
| August 19, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Western Division - Los Angeles Office |
| Los Angeles |
| Audrey B Collins |
| Jeffrey W Johnson |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1343 |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 11, 2011. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 131
MINUTE: ORDER Re: DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE (In Chambers): On March 31, 2011, the Court ordered Plaintiffs Sky Tag, Inc., et al. to show cause why this caseshould not be dismissed in light of the decision in World Wide Rush, LLC v. City of Los Angeles, 606 F.3d 676 (9th Cir. 2010). Plaintiffs responded on April 11, 2011, indicating that they have elected not to pursuing any remaining commercial speech claim after World Wide Rush and conceded that no otherviable claims remain in this case following the World Wide Rush decision. As a result, Plaintiff did not object to the Court dismissing this case, although they ask for dismissal without prejudice since the remaining commercial speech claim has never been litigated. Therefore, the Court DISMISSES this case WITHOUT PREJUDICE IT IS SO ORDERED by Judge Audrey B. Collins. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (ir)
|
| Filing 130 RESPONSE filed by Plaintiff Sky Tag, Inc.to Order on Motion for Summary Judgment, Order on Ex Parte Application to Strike, Order on Ex Parte Application for Order,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, #129 Response to OSC re: Dismissal (Mobley, Gary) |
|
Filing 129
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE Why Cases Should Not Be Dismissed; ORDER Denying WITHOUT PREJUDICE Pending Motions by Judge Audrey B. Collins denying #94 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying #100 Ex Parte Application to Strike ; denying #101 Ex Parte Application: The Ninth Circuit reversed the grant of summary judgment in favor of the Plaintiffs in the related case World Wide Rush, LLC v. City of Los Angeles, 606 F.3d 676 (9th Cir. 2010). Plaintiffs in these related cases were also part of that appeal. Id. at 680. Plaintiffs informed the Court that they believed their commercial speech claims remained after World Wide Rush, but they would notify the Court of the status of these cases once the time to seek review in the Supreme Court expired. That time has expired and nothing has been filed. Plaintiffs are ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE within 10 days of the date of this Order why these cases should not be dismissed following the Ninth Circuit's mandate in World Wide Rush. Failure to timely respond will result in dismissal of these cases without further notification to the parties. The Court also notes that several motions remain outstanding on the dockets in these two cases, namely: Docket Nos. 142, 162, 163, 169, 170, 175, 176, and 177 in the Jamison matter, all of which relate to a motion for summary judgment filed by Plaintiffs in that case; and Docket Nos. 94, 100, and 101 in the Sky Tag matter. Given the changed circumstances of these cases, all of these motions are DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE to refiling if necessary. (bm)
|
| Filing 128 NOTICE of Change of Attorney Information for attorney Gary S Mobley counsel for Plaintiff Sky Tag, Inc.. Changing address and firm name to GARY S. MOBLEY, A PROFESSIONAL CORP., 17011 Beach Blvd., Suite 900, Huntington Beach, CA 92647. Changing email and fax number to gmobley@gsmpc.com ; (714) 375-6672. Filed by Plaintiff SKY TAG, INC. (Mobley, Gary) |
| Filing 127 MINUTES OF Status Conference held before Judge Audrey B. Collins: The case is called and counsel are present. The Court conducts a Status Conference. The Court issues a Memorandum to the Parties. The Court states that they have already ruled on Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction (CV 08-6035, doc. # 37) and Plaintiff's motion for leave to file amended complaint (CV 08-6035, doc. # 40). The Court also states that the Figueroa cases (CV 08-5066 and CV 08-8508) had stipulated that the cases should be consolidated, but nothing has been filed. Parties have until October 18, 2010 to file said document. Plaintiff in Vanguard Case (CV 08-6035) shall file a motion for stay of the Court's order pending an immediate appeal by October 4, 2010. The City may file their opposition no later than October 12, 2010. Plaintiff may file a reply no later than October 14, 2010. Hearing to be set for October 18, 2010 at 10:00 a.m. Court Reporter: Katherine Stride. (bm) |
|
Filing 126
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS RE: Status Conference by Judge Audrey B. Collins: The Court held a status conference in the above-captioned cases on September 27, 2010. The Court orders as follows. All parties should have read the Court's Order denying the preliminary injunction in Vanguard Outdoor, LLC v. City of Los Angeles, CV 08-6035, amended on September 27, 2010. For the lead case that has been remanded, World Wide Rush v. City of Los Angeles, CV 07-238, any request to amend Plaintiff's complaint will likely be denied because the Ninth Circuit affirmed the Court's refusal to allow further amendments to the complaint in this case. The Court is willing to wait until the time for Supreme Court review has expired or review is denied before dismissing this case. The parties in the related World Wide Rush v. City of Los Angeles, CV 09-3793, noted that this case will also be dismissed based upon the outcome of Supreme Court review. In Paramount Contractors & Developers, Inc. v. City of Los Angeles, CV 08-5653, the Court issued a minute order on September 24, 2010, denying as moot the City's pending motion to dismiss (filed in October 2008) and gave Plaintiff until October 26, 2010, to file an amended complaint. In Vanguard Outdoor, LLC v. City of Los Angeles, CV 08-6035, the plaintiff was permitted to file its amended complaint without leave of Court, per the Court's Order on September 24, 2010 in that case. For all other cases, the main issue seems to be a Central Hudson challenge to the offsite and supergraphic sign bans (although there may be a few other claims in specific cases). For any plaintiff that has indicated in its joint status report that it would like to file an amended complaint, leave of Court must be obtained via regularly noticed motion, to be filed no later than Monday, November 2, 2010, unless the parties can stipulate to the filing of the amended complaint before that date. If a motion to amend is filed (or contemplated), the City is to wait for the Court to rule on the motion before filing a motion to dismiss in the same case. If the motion to amend is granted, the City may then file a motion attacking the amended pleading. In cases in which the plaintiff has indicated it will not seek leave to amend or the parties stipulate to the filing of an amended complaint, the City may want to file motions to resolve these cases. To the extent possible, the City should meet and confer with counsel for the plaintiffs in these cases to determine the most efficient approach, whether by a consolidated "master" motion filed in multiple cases or individual motions in each case. If individual motions are the more prudent approach, the City should not notice them all for the same hearing date. Finally, the parties in Figueroa Project 2, LLC v. City of Los Angeles, CV 08-5066 and CV 08-8508 agreed that these cases should be consolidated and would file a stipulation to that effect, but nothing has been filed. The parties are ORDERED to do so no later than Monday, October 18, 2010. (bm)
|
|
Filing 125
MINUTE: Notification Entry of Order in Vanguard Outdoor, LLC v. City of LosAngeles, CV 08-6035 ABC (JWJx) (In Chambers): The parties in the above-captioned cases are notified that the Court has entered an Order denyingthe Plaintiffs motion for preliminary injunction in Vanguard Outdoor, LLC v. City of Los Angeles, CV 08-6035 ABC (JWJx), available at Docket No. 51 in that case. All parties are ORDERED to familiarize themselves with the Courts Order in preparation for the status conferences set for Monday, September 27, 2010 at 11:00 a.m IT IS SO ORDERED by Judge Audrey B. Collins. (ir)
|
|
Filing 124
MINUTES: ORDER RE: STATUS CONFERENCE (In Chambers) by Judge Audrey B. Collins:The status conferences in the above-captioned cases currently set for Wednesday, September 22, 2010 is CONTINUED to Monday, September 27, 2010 at 11:00 a.m. IT IS SO ORDERED. (yl)
|
|
Filing 123
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS re Status Conference by Judge Audrey B. Collins: The parties in these matters are ORDERED to appear for a status conference on Wednesday, September 22, 2010 at 10:00 a.m. (bm)
|
| Filing 122 STATUS REPORT JOINT filed by Plaintiff Sky Tag, Inc.. (Mobley, Gary) |
| Filing 121 RESPONSE filed by Plaintiff Sky Tag, Inc.to Minutes of In Chambers Order/Directive - no proceeding held,,,,,, #120 (Mobley, Gary) |
|
Filing 120
MINUTES: ORDER RE: REQUEST FOR OSC RE DISMISSAL AND STATUS CONFERENCE (In Chambers): First, the Court ORDERS that, except in CV 08-7854 and CV 08-6035, any stay imposed in the above cases be LIFTED. Second, the Court ORDERS the parties in each action to meet and confer and the file a detailed joint status report in each case no later than Tuesday, August 24, 2010, setting forth their respective positions on the impact of the decision in World Wide Rush and what claims remain in each pending case, if any. The Court declines to set any status conferences until it has had an opportunity to review the parties reports. The City has requested that the Court immediately lift the injunction issued in favor of Plaintiff Community Redevelopment Agency in CV 08-7854 and the stay of enforcement in favor of Plaintiff Vanguard Outdoor, LLC in CV 08-6035, which were explicitly based upon the injunction vacated in World Wide Rush. Plaintiff Community Redevelopment Agency and Plaintiff Vanguard Outdoor, LLC are ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE no later than August 24, 2010 why the injunction and stay of enforcement should not be lifted in light of World Wide Rush. The City may reply to each Plaintiffs response no later than August 31, 2010. The Court recognizes that Plaintiffs World Wide Rush, Jamison, and Sky Tag are contemplating petitioning to the United States Supreme Court for review of the World Wide Rush decision and moving to recall the mandate issued by the Ninth Circuit while that petition is pending. Those Plaintiffs are ORDERED to notify the Court immediately upon filing any such petition or motion IT IS SO ORDERED by Judge Audrey B. Collins. (ir)
|
| Filing 119 SUPPLEMENT to Response (non-motion) #117 , Notice of Decision by other Court #115 filed by Plaintiff Sky Tag, Inc.. (Mobley, Gary) |
|
Filing 118
MINUTES: ORDER RE: REQUEST FOR OSC RE DISMISSAL AND STATUS CONFERENCE (In Chambers): On July 15, 2010, Defendant in the above cases, the City of Los Angeles, filed a request with the Court for an Order to Show Cause and for a status conference, following the mandate issued by the Ninth Circuit. On July 16, 2010, the Plaintiffs in case nos. CV 08-4762, CV 08-5434, and CV 08-5653filed responses to the Citys request. If any other Plaintiff in the above cases wishes to respond to the Citys request it may do so no later than Friday, July 23, 2010 IT IS SO ORDERED by Judge Audrey B. Collins. (ir)
|
| Filing 117 RESPONSE filed by Plaintiff Sky Tag, Inc.to USCA Mandate #116 , Notice of Decision by other Court #115 (Mobley, Gary) |
| Filing 116 MANDATE of 9th CCA filed re: Notice of Appeal to 9th Circuit Court of Appeals #76 , CCA # 09-55792. The decision of the District Court is AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED and VACATED in part. Mandate received in this district on 7/15/10. (cbr) |
| Filing 115 NOTICE of Decision: Ninth Circuit Order Denying Petition for En Banc Review in World Wide Rush Appeal filed by defendant City of Los Angeles. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Bostrom, Michael) |
|
Filing 114
ORDER from 9th CCA filed re: Notice of Appeal to 9th Circuit Court of Appeals #76 filed by City of Los Angeles, CCA # 09-55792. Order received in this district on 07/07/07. The petition for rehearing en banc is denied. (cbr)
|
| Filing 113 NOTICE of Decision: In World Wide Rush filed by Defendant City of Los Angeles. (Bostrom, Michael) |
|
Filing 112
ORDER from 9th CCA filed re: 9th CCA Assigned Case Number Notice #78 filed by City of Los Angeles, CCA # 09-55792. The order received in this district on 5/28/2010. Eash party shall bear its own costs of appeal. IT IS SO ORDERED. (lra)
|
|
Filing 111
ORDER from 9th CCA filed re: Notice of Appeal to 9th Circuit Court of Appeals #76 filed by City of Los Angeles, CCA # 09-55792. These appeals are consolidated for purposes of disposition. IT IS SO ORDERED. Order received in this district on 5/19/2010. (lr)
|
|
Filing 110
ORDER STAYING CASE by Judge Audrey B. Collins, the Court hereby STAYS these matters pending a decision by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals in World Wide Rush v. City of Los Angeles, District Court Case No. CV 07-238 ABC (JWJx), Court of Appeals Case No. 08-56454. The Court also VACATES the discovery, pre-trial and trial dates in these matters. The parties are ORDERED to jointly notify the Court within 10 days of the Court of Appeals' decision in the pending appeal of the WWR Matter. (jp)
|
| Filing 109 REPLY filed by Plaintiff Sky Tag, Inc. to Minutes of In Chambers Order/Directive - no proceeding held, Set Deadlines/Hearings,,,, #106 (Mobley, Gary) |
| Filing 108 RESPONSE filed by Defendant City of Los Angelesto Minutes of In Chambers Order/Directive - no proceeding held, Set Deadlines/Hearings,,,, #106 (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Re Stay)(Bostrom, Michael) |
| Filing 107 RESPONSE filed by Plaintiff Sky Tag, Inc.to Minutes of In Chambers Order/Directive - no proceeding held, Set Deadlines/Hearings,,,, #106 (Mobley, Gary) |
| Filing 106 MINUTES by Judge Audrey B. Collins: Proceedings: Order to Show Cause re Stay of Cases. The Court ORDERS Plaintiffs in these matters TO SHOW CAUSE why these cases should not be stayed under the Court's inherent authority pending resolution of the appeal in the WWR Matter. The briefing schedule on this matter is as follows: Plaintiffs must file their responses no later than Monday, November 23, 2009. Each Plaintiff's response may not exceed 15 pages. The City may file responses to each of Plaintiffs' filings no later than Monday, December 7, 2009. Each of the City's responses may not exceed 15 pages. Plaintiffs may file individual replies no later than Monday, December 14, 2009. Each reply may not to exceed 8 pages. (mg) |
| Filing 105 OPPOSITION TO CITY OF LOS ANGELES EX PARTE APPLICATION TO STRIKE THE DECLARATION OF KATHARINE HEIDY; MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES IN SUPPORT THEREOF Opposition re: EX PARTE APPLICATION for Order for Striking the Declaration of Katharine Heidy #101 , EX PARTE APPLICATION to Strike Declarations #100 filed by Plaintiff Sky Tag, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Declaration Corrected Declaration of Gary S. Mobley in Opposition to Defendant's Ex Parte Application to Strike Declaration of Katherine Heidy and Exhibits A-D)(Mobley, Gary) |
| Filing 104 OPPOSITION TO CITY OF LOS ANGELES EX PARTE APPLICATION TO STRIKE THE DECLARATION OF KATHARINE HEIDY; MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES IN SUPPORT THEREOF Opposition re: EX PARTE APPLICATION for Order for Striking the Declaration of Katharine Heidy #101 , EX PARTE APPLICATION to Strike Declarations #100 filed by Plaintiff Sky Tag, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Gary S. Mobley in Opposition to Defendant's Ex Parte Application to Strike Declaration of Katherine Heidy; Exhibits A-D)(Mobley, Gary) |
| Filing 103 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) by Judge Audrey B. Collins: Proceedings: Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment. Pending before the Court is Plaintiffs' #94 Motion for Summary Judgment, filed on September 4, 2009. The Court finds this matter appropriate for resolution without oral argument and VACATES the November 9, 2009 hearing date. Fed. R. Civ. P. 78; Local Rule 7-15. The Court takes the matter UNDER SUBMISSION. (mg) |
| Filing 102 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents. The following error was found: Incorrect event selected. The document was docketed as a Motion. Correct event is Notices/Notice of Lodging. See General Order 08-02 regarding electronically filed proposed documents RE: EX PARTE APPLICATION for Order for Striking the Declaration of Katharine Heidy #101 . In response to this notice the court may order (1) an amended or correct document to be filed (2) the document stricken or (3) take other action as the court deems appropriate. (ir) |
| Filing 101 EX PARTE APPLICATION for Order for Striking the Declaration of Katharine Heidy filed by Defendant City of Los Angeles.(Westhoff, Kim) |
| Filing 100 EX PARTE APPLICATION to Strike Declarations filed by Defendant City of Los Angeles. (Attachments: #1 Declar of Sarah Urling, #2 Declar of Mike Harvey, #3 Declar of Kim Rodgers Westhoff, #4 Declar of Katrina Van Duyn, #5 Declar of Jeff Gailey)(Westhoff, Kim) |
|
Filing 99
MINUTES: ORDER Re: PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT #94 (In Chambers); The hearing on the above-referenced motion is presently set for October 26, 2009. Due to court congestion, the Court hereby CONTINUES the hearing to Monday, November 9, 2009, at 10:00 a.m. IT IS SO ORDERED by Judge Audrey B. Collins. (ir)
|
| Filing 98 MINUTES OF IN CHAMBERS ORDER re: PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT held before Judge Audrey B. Collins: The hearing on the above-referenced motion is presently set for October 5, 2009. Due to court congestion, the Court hereby CONTINUES the hearing to Monday, October 26, 2009, at 10:00 a.m. (bm) |
| Filing 97 RESPONSE filed by Defendant City of Los Angeles (Westhoff, Kim) |
| Filing 96 REPLY MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Plaintiffs Sky Tag, Inc. #94 filed by Plaintiff Sky Tag, Inc.. (Mobley, Gary) |
| Filing 95 Opposition Motion for Summary Judgment re: MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Plaintiffs Sky Tag, Inc. #94 filed by Defendant City of Los Angeles. (Attachments: #1 City's Separate Statement, #2 City's Objections to Decls. of Helt, Mobley and McNeilly, #3 Declaration of Frank Lara, #4 Declaration of Robert Sunseri, #5 Declaration of Edward J. Oddone, #6 Declaration of Arthur H. Barens, #7 Declaration of Domingo T. Sauceda, #8 Declaration of Sheran O. Hoye, #9 Declaration of Blake Lamb, Exh. A, Pages 1 through 10, #10 Declaration of Blake Lamb, Exh. A, Pages 11 through 20, #11 Declaration of Kim Rodgers Westhoff, Exhibit A, #12 Declaration of Kim Rodgers Westhoff, Exhibit B, #13 Declaration of Kim Rodgers Westhoff, Exhibit C, #14 Declaration of Kim Rodgers Westhoff, Exhibit D, #15 Declaration of Kim Rodgers Westhoff, Exhibit E, #16 Declaration of Kim Rodgers Westhoff, Exhibit F, #17 Declaration of Kim Rodgers Westhoff, Exhibit G, #18 Declaration of Kim Rodgers Westhoff, Exhibit H, #19 Declaration of Kim Rodgers Westhoff, Exhibit I, #20 Declaration of Kim Rodgers Westhoff, Exhibit J, #21 Declaration of Kim Rodgers Westhoff, Exhibit K, #22 Declaration of Kim Rodgers Westhoff, Exhibit L)(Westhoff, Kim) |
| Filing 94 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Plaintiffs Sky Tag, Inc. filed by Plaintiff Sky Tag, Inc.. Motion set for hearing on 10/5/2009 at 10:00 AM before Judge Audrey B. Collins. (Attachments: #1 Supplement Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of Plaintiffs' MSJ)(Mobley, Gary) |
| Filing 93 RESPONSE BY THE COURT TO NOTICE TO FILER OF Deficiencies in Electronicallly filed documents: The document is stricken. Counsel has since re-filed the document correctly RE: Notice (Other) #90 (ir) |
| Filing 92 NOTICE of Change of Attorney Information for attorney Gary S Mobley counsel for Plaintiff Sky Tag, Inc.. Filed by Plaintiff Amy A. Hoff (Mobley, Gary) |
| Filing 91 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents. The following error(s) was found: Notice of Change of Attorney Information #90 . Incorrect event selected. Correct event is Notice-Change of Attorney Information (G-06). In response to this notice the court may order (1) an amended or correct document to be filed (2) the document stricken or (3) take other action as the court deems appropriate. (bm) |
| Filing 90 NOTICE OF CHANGE OF ATTORNEY INFORMATION filed by Plaintiff Sky Tag, Inc.. (Mobley, Gary) |
| Filing 89 NOTICE of Change of Attorney Information for attorney Tayo A Popoola counsel for Defendant City of Los Angeles. Adding Tayo A. Popoola as attorney as counsel of record for City of Los Angeles for the reason indicated in the G-06 Notice. Filed by defendant City of Los Angeles (Popoola, Tayo) |
| Filing 88 NOTICE of Change of Attorney Information for attorney Michael J Bostrom counsel for Defendant City of Los Angeles. Adding Michael J. Bostrom as attorney as counsel of record for City of Los Angeles for the reason indicated in the G-06 Notice. Filed by defendant Michael J. Bostrom (Bostrom, Michael) |
| Filing 87 CERTIFICATE OF RECORD Transmitted to USCA re Notice of Appeal to 9th Circuit Court of Appeals #76 filed by City of Los Angeles ; Court of Appeals Case Number: 09-55792. (lr) |
| Filing 86 NOTICE of Change of Attorney Information for attorney Colleen M Courtney counsel for Defendant City of Los Angeles. Colleen M. Courtney will no longer receive service of documents from the Clerks Office for the reason indicated in the G-06 Notice.Colleen M. Courtney is no longer attorney of record for the aforementioned party in this case for the reason indicated in the G-06 Notice. Filed by Defendant City of Los Angeles (Courtney, Colleen) |
| Filing 84 NOTICE OF FILING TRANSCRIPT filed for proceedings 3/16/2009; 10:00 AM (Stride, Katherine) |
| Filing 83 TRANSCRIPT for proceedings held on 3/16/2009: 10:00 AM. Court Reporter/Electronic Court Recorder: Katherine M. Stride, phone number 213-625-0677. Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased through the Court Reporter/Electronic Court Recorder before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER. Notice of Intent to Redact due within 7 days of this date. Redaction Request due 6/25/2009. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 7/5/2009. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 9/2/2009. (Stride, Katherine) |
|
Filing 85
ORDER from 9th CCA filed re: Notice of Appeal to 9th Circuit Court of Appeals #76 filed by City of Los Angeles, CCA # 09-55792. This is a preliminary injunction appeal. Appellant's telephonic motion for a 14-day extension of time to file the opening brief is granted. The briefing shall proceed as follows: the opening brief is due not later than July 7, 2009; the answering brief is due August 4, 2009, or 28 days after service of the opening brief, whichever is earlier; and the optional reply brief is due within 14 days of service of the anwsering brief. See 9th Cir. R. 3-3(b). If appellant fails to file timely the opening brief, this appeal will be dismissed automatically by the Clerk for failure to prosecute. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. Order received in this district on 6/03/09. (lr)
|
| Filing 81 NOTICE OF APPEAL NOTIFICATION form issued regarding Notice of Appeal to 9th Circuit Court of Appeals #76 as to Defendant City of Los Angeles. (lr) |
| Filing 80 TRANSCRIPT DESIGNATION AND ORDERING FORM For Dates: March 16, 2009; Court Reporter: Katherine Stride; Court of Appeals Case Number: 09-55792; Re: #76 (Popoola, Tayo) |
| Filing 82 APPEAL FEE PAID: re Notice of Appeal to 9th Circuit Court of Appeals #76 as to Defendant City of Los Angeles; Receipt Number: 119007, Paid in the amount of $455. (lr) |
|
Filing 79
ORDER from 9th CCA filed re: Notice of Appeal to 9th Circuit Court of Appeals #76 filed by City of Los Angeles, CCA # 09-55792. The order order received in this district on 5/27/2009. Filing and docketing fees for the appeal remain due. Within 21 days after the date of this order, appellant shall pay to the district court the $455.00 filing and docketing fees for this appeal and file in this court proof of such payment. Failure to pay the fees shall result in the automatic dismissal of the appeal by the Clerk for failure to prosecute. (lra)
|
| Filing 78 NOTIFICATION by Circuit Court of Appellate Docket Number 09-55792, 9th CCA regarding Notice of Appeal to 9th Circuit Court of Appeals #76 as to Defendant City of Los Angeles. (lra) |
| Filing 77 Civil Appeals Docketing Statement received from Defendant City of Los Angeles forwarded to 9th CCA. RE: Notice of Appeal to 9th Circuit Court of Appeals #76 (Popoola, Tayo) |
| Filing 76 NOTICE OF APPEAL to the 9th CCA filed by Defendant City of Los Angeles. Appeal of Minutes of In Chambers Order/Directive - no proceeding held,,,,,,,, #72 . (Filing Fee NOT PAID.) (Popoola, Tayo) |
| Filing 75 CORRECTED JOINT REPORT of Meet and Confer on Discovery Management filed by Plaintiffs Sky Posters Inc., Sky Tag, Inc., Sky Tag West, Inc., Sunset & Vine, Inc., West Hollywood Inc., Sky Creative Services, Inc.. (Kugler, Andrew) |
| Filing 74 MINUTES OF IN CHAMBERS ORDER held before Judge Audrey B. Collins: Pursuant to the minute order date May 4, 2009, footnote 2, the parties in Jamison and Sky Tag actions have notified the Court that the May 11, 2009 scheduling conference is not necessary. The Scheduling Conference is hereby VACATED. (bm) |
| Filing 73 MINUTES OF IN CHAMBERS ORDER re Scheduling Conference in CV 08-07584 ABC (JWJx), CV 08-08058 ABC (JWJx), CV 08-08043 ABC (JWJx), and CV 08-07777 ABC (JWJx) held before Judge Audrey B. Collins: This Court has before it numerous cases relating to the City's regulation of billboards. For the convenience of the Court (and the parties), these matters should all proceed in tandem. Accordingly, the Court sets the following case management schedule for all of the Active Cases: Cut-off for Amending Pleadings: August 3, 2009; Deadline for Initial Expert Disclosures: February 4, 2010; Deadline for Rebuttal Expert Disclosures: February 25, 2010; Cut-off for Non-expert discovery: March 1, 2010; Cut-off for Filing Dispositive Motions: March 15, 2010; Deadline for Oppositions to Dispositive Motions: March 29, 2010; Cut-off for Expert Discovery: April 5, 2010; Deadline for Expert Discovery: April 5, 2010; Deadline for Replies in Support of Dispositive Motions: April 12, 2010; Hearing on Dispositive Motions: April 26, 2010; Pre-Trial Conference: June 7, 2010, 10:00 a.m.; Trial: June 22, 2010, 8:30 a.m. There will be no bifurcation of liability and damages discovery. The parties in the Active Cases are ORDERED to meet and confer within ten days of this order to discuss management of discovery. In particular, the parties should discuss the feasability of scheduling depositions so that all relevant parties can participate and avoid calling witnesses on multiple occasions to answer the same line of questioning. The parties are ORDERED to submit, within twenty days of this order, a joint report setting forth the outcome of the parties' discussions. The Court STAYS all currently scheduled depositions pending completion of the meet and confer. (see order for further details) (bm) |
|
Filing 72
MINUTES: EXPANDING PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION (In Chambers) ; Plaintiff's request is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. Pending resolution of this litigation, the City is ENJOINED from enforcing, directing or indirectly, the relevant exceptions in LAMC sections 14.4.4(B)(9) and (11) as to billboards identified by Plaintiffs at the 18 locations set forth above. The City is ORDERED to discharge, within 10 days of this order, the previously issued citations for violations of LAMC 12.21.A.1.(a), 91.106, 91.6201.2, and 91.6201.4 as to the 1800 N. Highland Ave., 6380 W. Wilshire Blvd., 6300 W. Wilshire Blvd, 4929 W. Wilshire Blvd., 10921 W. Wilshire Blvd., 11600 W. Wilshire Blvd.,10203 W. Santa Monica Blvd., 1256 W. 7th St., 110 E. 9th St. (aka 952 S. Main St.), 4955 N. Van Nuys Blvd., and 1990 S. Westwood Blvd. locations. The City is ORDERED to discharge, within 10 days of this order, the previously issued citations for violation of 108.4.1 of the California Code of Regulations as to the 6300 W. Wilshire Blvd., 4929 W. Wilshire Blvd., and 10203 Santa Monica Blvd. locations. The City is ORDERED to discharge, within 10 days of this order, the previously issued citations for violations of LAMC 14.4.10 and14.4.16 as to the 6380 W. Wilshire Blvd., 6300 W. Wilshire Blvd., 11600 W. Wilshire Blvd., 10203 W. Santa Monica Blvd., 1256 W. 7th St., 110 E. 9th St. (aka 952 S. Main St.), 4955 N. Van Nuys Blvd., and 1990 S. Westwood Blvd. locations.11, 12 The City is being ordered to discharge certain citations as to locations that are not included within the scope of the injunction; that is because even though the ICO precludes signs at certain locations, citations that are no more than an attempt to enforce the unconstitutional provisions of the LAMC are still invalid. Last, the Court ORDERS the City to notifyPlaintiffs, within 10 days of this order, as to how they can appeal the fire/safety citations and/or meet the Fire Department's concerns IT IS SO ORDERED by Judge Audrey B. Collins. (ir)
|
|
Filing 71
MINUTES: SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE; REQUESTING JOINT REPORT (In Chambers) The Court SETS a scheduling conference in these matters for May 11, 2009 at 10:00 a.m. The parties are ORDERED to submit a revised joint report, in accordance with the procedures and schedules for Chief Judge Collins (see Chief Judge Collins Standing Orders (available at www.cacd.uscourts.gov, follow link from Judges Procedures & Schedules)), by no later than May 9, 2009 at 11:59 p.m. As the parties are well aware, these cases are related to various other actions proceeding on this Courts calendar. Accordingly, theCourt intends to have the case schedule in these matters proceed in tandem with Community Redevelopment Assn, LLC v. City of Los Angeles CV 08-07584 ABC (JWJx), Fuel Outdoor, LLC v. City of Los Angeles CV 08-08058 ABC (JWJx), Sheltervision Media, Inc. v. City of Los Angeles CV 08-08043 ABC (JWJx), and Astra Pacific Outdoor, LLC v. City of Los Angeles CV 08-07777 ABC (JWJx). In those matters, the parties have been ordered to submit an omnibus schedule. If there is any reason it might not be possible for the parties in these matters to follow that schedule, the parties should note as such in their joint report IT IS SO ORDERED by Judge Audrey B. Collins. (ir)
|
|
Filing 70
ORDER RE: BILLBOARDS by Judge Audrey B. Collins: The WWR Plaintiffs' motion for contempt (WWR Docket No. 208), the motion is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. The Court FINDS clear and convincing evidence that the City is in contempt of the World Wide Rush Injunction. The Court ORDERS the City to discharge the citations for 12.21.A.1.(a), 14.4.16, 91.6201.2, and 91.6201.4 as to the 10801 National location within 10 days of this order. Furthermore, the Court ORDERS the City to discharge the citation under 14.4.10 as to the sign on the North wall at the 10801 National location within 10 days of this order. The Court also ORDERS the City (and Fire Department) to discharge the citation for California Code of Regulations 108.4.1 as to the 5150 Wilshire location within 10 days of this order. As a sanction, the Court AWARDS the WWR Plaintiffs the fees and costs incurred in bringing their ex parte application (Docket No. 205) and this motion (Docket Nos. 208 et seq.). The Court ORDERS the WWR Plaintiffs to submit an accounting to the City within 30 days of this order. The City should make payment to the WWR Plaintiffs within 40 days of this order. If the City objects to the amount, and the WWR Plaintiffs are not able to reach agreement with the City on the appropriate recovery, the City can withhold payment and the parties should stipulate to, and submit to the Court, within 40 days of this order, a briefing schedule for resolution of the issue. As to the remaining fire safety citations, the Court ORDERS the City to notify the WWR Plaintiffs, within 10 days of this order, as to how they can appeal the citations and/or meet the Fire Department's concerns. Lastly, the Court ORDERS the City and Fire Department to file a report with the Court, within 60 days of this order, as to how many Supergraphic Signs in the Hollywood SUD still cover windows and how many of those signs have been cited for fire safety violations. As to the Jamison-Sky Tag Plaintiffs' motion for a preliminary injunction (Jamison Docket No. 71), the motion is DENIED. As to the 85 locations misrepresented by McNeilly, the motion is DENIED WITH PREJUDICE. As to the remaining 33 locations, the motion is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE as the Court lacks sufficient information to rule as to those locations. If the Jamison-Sky Tag Plaintiffs continue to seek relief as to these 33 locations, they should file a brief within seven days of this order identifying the signs at the 33 locations and the need for injunctive relief as to those signs. The City may file an opposition brief within 14 days of this order and the Jamison Sky-Tag Plaintiffs may file a reply brief within 21 days of this order. As to Liberty's motion to amend (CRA Docket No. 33) the injunction in that matter, the motion is DENIED. Likewise, the City's motion for reconsideration (CRA Docket No. 32) is DENIED. As to Figueroa's motions to stay (CV 08-08508 (Docket No. 12); CV 08-05066 (Docket No. 16)), the motions are GRANTED. Those cases are hereby STAYED pending resolution of the appeal of the World Wide Rush Order. The Court ORDERS Figueroa to file a notice of determination in the Figueroa Cases within ten days of a decision on the appeal of the World Wide Rush Order. (see order for further details) (bm)
|
| Filing 69 MINUTES OF Motion Hearing held before Judge Audrey B. Collins: Court issued a tentative order. Counsel apepared and argued their positions. Court to issue ruling.Court Reporter: Katherine Stride. (da) |
|
Filing 68
MINUTES: CONTINUING HEARINGS (In Chambers) As a result of conflicting duties required of the Chief Judge, the Court hereby CONTINUES the hearing date for all motions currently set for hearing on March 9, 2009 in the above noted cases. The Court CONTINUES the hearing to March 16, 2009 at 10:00 a.m.IT IS SO ORDERED by Judge Audrey B. Collins. (ir)
|
| Filing 66 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents. The following error(s) was found: Declaration of Gary S. Mobley #63 . Attached document indicates Supplemental Declaration in caption of document, which is not reflected in the docket entry text. In response to this notice the court may order (1) an amended or correct document to be filed (2) the document stricken or (3) take other action as the court deems appropriate. (bm) |
| Filing 67 MINUTES: DENYING EX PARTE REQUEST (In Chambers) The Court has received plaintiffs ex parte requests to expand the scope of the current injunction. (CV 08-04762 Docket No. 59; CV 08-05435 #61 .) The requests are DENIED by Judge Audrey B. Collins. (ir) |
| Filing 65 PROOF OF SERVICE OF SERVICE filed by PLAINTIFFS Sky Posters Inc., Sky Tag, Inc., Sky Tag West, Inc., Sunset & Vine, Inc., West Hollywood Inc., Sky Creative Services, Inc., re EX PARTE APPLICATION for Preliminary Injunction re EXPANDING SCOPE OF TEMPORARY PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION #61 RE EX PARTE DOCUMENTS served on 02/06/09. (Mobley, Gary) |
| Filing 64 NOTICE OF LODGING filed PROPOSED ORDER re EX PARTE APPLICATION for Preliminary Injunction re EXPANDING SCOPE OF TEMPORARY PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION #61 (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Mobley, Gary) |
| Filing 63 DECLARATION of GARY S. MOBLEY SUPPORT OF EX PARTE EX PARTE APPLICATION for Preliminary Injunction re EXPANDING SCOPE OF TEMPORARY PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION #61 SUPPLEMENTAL filed by Plaintiffs Sky Posters Inc., Sky Tag, Inc., Sky Tag West, Inc., Sunset & Vine, Inc., West Hollywood Inc., Sky Creative Services, Inc.. (Mobley, Gary) |
| Filing 62 DECLARATION of GARY S. MOBLEY IN SUPPORT OF EX PARTE EX PARTE APPLICATION for Preliminary Injunction re EXPANDING SCOPE OF TEMPORARY PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION #61 filed by Plaintiffs Sky Posters Inc., Sky Tag, Inc., Sky Tag West, Inc., Sunset & Vine, Inc., West Hollywood Inc., Sky Creative Services, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit "B-G")(Mobley, Gary) |
| Filing 61 EX PARTE APPLICATION for Preliminary Injunction re EXPANDING SCOPE OF TEMPORARY PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION filed by PLAINTIFFS Sky Posters Inc., Sky Tag, Inc., Sky Tag West, Inc., Sunset & Vine, Inc., West Hollywood Inc., Sky Creative Services, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit "A")(Mobley, Gary) |
| Filing 60 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Amy A Hoff on behalf of Plaintiffs Sky Posters Inc., Sky Tag, Inc., Sky Tag West, Inc., Sunset & Vine, Inc., West Hollywood Inc., Sky Creative Services, Inc. (Hoff, Amy) |
| Filing 59 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) by Judge Audrey B. Collins: Proceedings Setting hearing and Briefing Schedule. The Court schedules the preliminary injunction hearing #49 , #57 for Monday 3/9/09 at 10:00 AM. Plaintiffs' opening brief is due 21 days prior to the hearing date; the City's response is due 14 days prior to the hearing date; and Plaintiffs' reply is due 7 days prior to the hearing date. (mg) |
| Filing 58 JOINT PROPOSED BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON OSC RE: PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION AND EXPEDITED DISCOVERY SCHEDULE filed by Plaintiffs Sky Posters Inc., Sky Tag, Inc., Sky Tag West, Inc., Sunset & Vine, Inc., West Hollywood Inc., Sky Creative Services, Inc. re: Order,, #57 (Mobley, Gary) |
|
Filing 57
ORDER by Judge Audrey B. Collins Granting in Part and, Denying in Part Plaintiffs' APPLICATION for Injunctive Relief #49 . The Court DENIES the requests to directly enjoin enforcement of the City's Orders to Comply. However, the Court PRELIMINARILY ENJOINS the City from enforcing, directly or indirectly, the relevant exceptions in LAMC sections 14.4.4(B)(9) and (11) as to Plaintiffs' billboards at 4929 W. Wilshire Blvd., 10921 W. Wilshire Blvd., and 10203 W. Santa Monica Blvd. The parties are ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE as to why this injunction should not remain in effect for the duration of this litigation. The parties are ORDERED to submit their proposed schedule by no later than January 20, 2009. (mg)
|
| Filing 56 REPLY RE EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER AND OSC RE PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION filed by Plaintiff Sky Tag, Inc.. (Mobley, Gary) |
| Filing 55 OPPOSITION to EX PARTE APPLICATION for Temporary Restraining Order as to ENJOINING CITY FROM ENFORCING SIGN ORDINANCE #49 filed by Defendant City of Los Angeles. (Attachments: #1 Declaration Objection by City to Decl. of Michael McNeily, #2 Declaration Objection by City to Decl of Gary Mobley, #3 Defendant City's Request for Judicial Notice)(Westhoff, Kim) |
| Filing 54 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS ORDER) held before Judge Audrey B. Collins: Proceedings: Declining to Stay Action. The Court declines to issue the requested stay. Now that a stay is no longer mutually agreeable, the appropriate method to obtain a stay is through motion practice. Re: Stipulation to Stay Case #40 , #34 . (mg) |
| Filing 53 PROOF OF SERVICE OF SERVICE filed by PLAINTIFFS Sky Tag, Inc., re EX PARTE APPLICATION for Temporary Restraining Order as to ENJOINING CITY FROM ENFORCING SIGN ORDINANCE #49 served on 01/12/09 EX PARTE PAPERS. (Mobley, Gary) |
| Filing 52 NOTICE OF LODGING filed re EX PARTE APPLICATION for Temporary Restraining Order as to ENJOINING CITY FROM ENFORCING SIGN ORDINANCE #49 (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order RE PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION, #2 Proposed Order RE TRO)(Mobley, Gary) |
| Filing 51 DECLARATION of GARY S. MOBLEY IN SUPPORT OF EX PARTE APPLICATION EX PARTE APPLICATION for Temporary Restraining Order as to ENJOINING CITY FROM ENFORCING SIGN ORDINANCE #49 filed by Plaintiff Sky Tag, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit I)(Mobley, Gary) |
| Filing 50 DECLARATION of MICHAEL McNEILLY IN SUPPORT OF EX PARTE EX PARTE APPLICATION for Temporary Restraining Order as to ENJOINING CITY FROM ENFORCING SIGN ORDINANCE #49 WITH EXHIBITS A - H filed by Plaintiff Sky Tag, Inc.. (Mobley, Gary) |
| Filing 49 EX PARTE APPLICATION for Temporary Restraining Order as to ENJOINING CITY FROM ENFORCING SIGN ORDINANCE filed by PLAINITFFS Sky Tag, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Mobley, Gary) |
| Filing 48 MEMORANDUM in Opposition to APPLICATION for Leave to File Response/Objections to Plaintiffs' Reply and Sur Reply (relates to 12/15/08 Minute Order- No hearing set on Application) APPLICATION for Leave to File Response/Objections to Plaintiffs' Reply and Sur Reply (relates to 12/15/08 Minute Order- No hearing set on Application) #41 filed by Plaintiff Sky Tag, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit "A")(Mobley, Gary) |
| Filing 47 NOTICE OF LODGING filed re APPLICATION for Leave to File Response/Objections to Plaintiffs' Reply and Sur Reply (relates to 12/15/08 Minute Order- No hearing set on Application) APPLICATION for Leave to File Response/Objections to Plaintiffs' Reply and Sur Reply (relates to 12/15/08 Minute Order- No hearing set on Application) #41 , Response in Opposition to Motion,, #43 (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order PROPOSED ORDER)(Mobley, Gary) |
| Filing 46 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents. The following error was found: Incorrect event used. Correct event is Motions and Related Filings: Requests - Extension of time to file document. Proposed Order was not submitted as separate attachment. RE: Response in Opposition to Motion,, #43 . In response to this notice the court may order (1) an amended or correct document to be filed (2) the document stricken or (3) take other action as the court deems appropriate. (ir) |
| Filing 45 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents. The following error was found: Document linked incorrectly to the wrong document/docket entry RE: APPLICATION for Leave to File Response/Objections to Plaintiffs' Reply and Sur Reply (relates to 12/15/08 Minute Order- No hearing set on Application) #41 . In response to this notice the court may order (1) an amended or correct document to be filed (2) the document stricken or (3) take other action as the court deems appropriate. (ir) |
| Filing 44 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents. The following error was found: Proposed document was not submitted as separate document RE: APPLICATION for Leave to File Response/Objections to Plaintiffs' Reply and Sur Reply (relates to 12/15/08 Minute Order- No hearing set on Application) #41 . In response to this notice the court may order (1) an amended or correct document to be filed (2) the document stricken or (3) take other action as the court deems appropriate. (ir) |
| Filing 43 OPPOSITION to APPLICATION for Leave to File Response/Objections to Plaintiffs' Reply and Sur Reply (relates to 12/15/08 Minute Order- No hearing set on Application) APPLICATION for Leave to File Response/Objections to Plaintiffs' Reply and Sur Reply (relates to 12/15/08 Minute Order- No hearing set on Application) #41 REQUEST FOR ONE DAY EXTENSION TO FILE RESPONSE TO DEFENDANTS APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO FILE RESPONSE/OBJECTIONS, ETC. filed by Plaintiff Sky Tag, Inc.. (Mobley, Gary) |
| Filing 42 NOTICE OF LODGING filed re Scheduling Conference,,, Set Deadlines/Hearings,,, Set Motion and R&R Deadlines,, #33 (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Courtney, Colleen) |
| Filing 41 APPLICATION for Leave to File Response/Objections to Plaintiffs' Reply and Sur Reply (relates to 12/15/08 Minute Order- No hearing set on Application) filed by Defendant City of Los Angeles. Application set for hearing on 12/15/2008 at 10:00 AM before Judge Audrey B. Collins. (Courtney, Colleen) |
| Filing 40 NOTICE OF LODGING filed re Stipulation to Stay Case, #34 (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order REVISED PROPOSED ORDER STAYING CASES PENDING RESOLUTION OF APPEALS OF RELATED CASES)(Mobley, Gary) |
| Filing 39 DECLARATION of MICHAEL McNEILLY re Stipulation to Stay Case, #34 filed by Plaintiff Sky Tag, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit D)(Mobley, Gary) |
| Filing 38 REPLY in support of Proposed Stay Order filed by Plaintiff Sky Tag, Inc.. (Mobley, Gary) |
| Filing 37 DECLARATION of Michael McNeilly re Report #35 filed by Plaintiff Sky Tag, Inc.. (Mobley, Gary) |
| Filing 36 RESPONSE filed by Defendant City of Los Angelesto Scheduling Conference,,, Set Deadlines/Hearings,,, Set Motion and R&R Deadlines,, #33 Resp Pltfs Proposed Stipulation (Courtney, Colleen) |
| Filing 35 PLAINTIFFS REPORT ON RESULTS OF MEET AND CONFER CONFERENCE RE: PROPOSED STIPULATED STAY ORDER REPORT of PLAINTIFFS REPORT ON RESULTS OF MEET AND CONFER CONFERENCE RE: PROPOSED STIPULATED STAY ORDER filed by Plaintiff Sky Tag, Inc.. (Mobley, Gary) |
| Filing 34 STIPULATION to Stay Case pending RESOLUTION OF APPEALS OF RELATED CASES filed by Plaintiffs Sky Tag, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit "A", #2 Proposed Order [PROPOSED] ORDER STAYING CASES PENDING RESOLUTION OF APPEALS OF RELATED CASES)(Mobley, Gary) |
| Filing 33 MINUTES OF Scheduling Conference held before Judge Audrey B. Collins: Matter called. Court and counsel confer regarding stay. Counsel to meet and confer regarding proposed language to be used in stipulation no later than December 19, 2008. Counsel to e-file joint stipulation if agreement has been reached by December 22, 2008. If no agreement can be reached plaintiffs' counsel to e-file stipulation to the Court. Objection to stipulation due December 29. 2008, response to objection due January 5, 2009. Court will consider objection and adopt or reject stipulation to stay. Court Reporter: Katherine Stride. (bm) |
|
Filing 32
ORDER RE TRANSFER PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 08-05 -Related Case- filed. Related Case No: CV 07-0159 ABC (JWJx). Case transferred from Magistrate Judge Frederick F. Mumm and Judge Otis D Wright, II to Judge Audrey B. Collins and Magistrate Judge Jeffrey W. Johnson for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge CV 08-5434 ABC (JWJx).Signed by Judge Audrey B. Collins (rn)
|
|
Filing 31
ORDER RE TRANSFER PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 08-05 -Related Case- filed. Related Case No: CV 07-0159 ABC (JWJx). Case transferred from Magistrate Judge Frederick F. Mumm and Judge Otis D Wright, II to Judge Audrey B. Collins and Magistrate Judge Jeffrey W. Johnson for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge CV 08-5434 ABC (JWJx).Signed by Judge Audrey B. Collins#(rn)
|
| Filing 30 RESPONSE filed by Defendant City of Los Angelesto Joint Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan #13 (Courtney, Colleen) |
| Filing 29 MINUTES OF IN CHAMBERS ORDER held before Judge Otis D Wright, II: The Scheduling Conference set for December 15, 2008 at 1:30 p.m. is hereby CONTINUED to Monday, January 5, 2009 at 1:30 p.m. (lc) |
| Filing 28 MINUTES OF IN CHAMBERS ORDER held before Judge Otis D Wright, II: Further Status Conference scheduled for 12/8/2008 1:30 PM is CONTINUED to 12/15/2008 1:30 PM. (lc) |
| Filing 26 SUPPLEMENT filed by Plaintiff Sky Tag, Inc.. (Mobley, Gary) |
| Filing 27 MINUTES OF FURTHER PROCEEDINGS RE: STIPULATION held before Magistrate Judge Frederick F. Mumm: Case called. Counsel make their appearance. Matter was referred to this Court for the purpose of assisting the parties to reach an agreement regarding the terms of a stay of this action. Parties could not reach an agreement.Court Smart: CS 12/2/08. (sl) |
| Filing 25 ANSWER to Complaint - (Discovery) #1 , Amended Complaint, #18 Answer to First Amended Complaint filed by Defendant City of Los Angeles.(Westhoff, Kim) |
|
Filing 24
RESPONSE BY THE COURT TO NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES INELECTRONICALLY FILED DOCUMENTS AND ORDER by Judge Otis D Wright, II striking RE: Notice of Lodging #21 , Notice of Lodging #22 , Stipulation to Continue #20 :The stipulation and proposed orders were intended to continue a scheduling conference for a different case. The scheduling conference in this case is already scheduled for 12/8/08 at 1:30 p.m. The Court notes the stipulation has been filed in the correct case on this date and will rule on that stipulation accordingly. (lc)
|
| Filing 23 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents. The following error(s) was found: PDF image is the proposed order, which should not be e-filed in itself, but should have been submitted as a Separate Attachment to the main document (#21); also missing filer as to entries #21,22. RE: Notice of Lodging #22 . In response to this notice the court may order (1) an amended or correct document to be filed (2) the document stricken or (3) take other action as the court deems appropriate. (lc) |
| Filing 22 NOTICE OF LODGING filed [Proposed] Order re Stipulation to Continue #20 (Mobley, Gary) |
| Filing 21 NOTICE OF LODGING filed of [Proposed] Order re Stipulation to Continue #20 (Mobley, Gary) |
| Filing 20 STIPULATION to Continue Rule 26 Scheduling Conference from November 24, 2008 to December 8, 2008 filed by plaintiff Sky Tag, Inc..(Mobley, Gary) |
| Filing 19 MINUTES OF Scheduling Conference held before Judge Otis D Wright, II: The Court confers with counsel.The Court CONTINUES the matter to Monday, 12/8/2008 01:30 PM.Court Reporter: Anne Kielwasser. (lc) |
| Filing 18 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against defendant City of Los Angeles amending Complaint - (Discovery) #1 ,filed by plaintiffs Sky Posters Inc., Sky Tag, Inc., Sky Tag West, Inc., Sunset & Vine, Inc., West Hollywood Inc., Sky Creative Services, Inc. (lc) (lc). |
| Filing 17 JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan SUPPLEMENT TO JOINT REPORT ; estimated length of trial 5, filed by Plaintiffs Sky Posters Inc., Sky Tag, Inc., Sky Tag West, Inc., Sunset & Vine, Inc., West Hollywood Inc., Sky Creative Services, Inc... (Attachments: #1 Exhibit "A")(Mobley, Gary) |
|
Filing 16
ORDER upon Stipulation #14 that Plaintiffs are granted leave to file a FirstAmended Complaint in this action. Said First Amended Complaint shall be filed and served within 5 days from the date of entry of this order by Judge Otis D Wright, II (lc)
|
| Filing 15 NOTICE OF LODGING filed OF PROPOSED ORDER re Stipulation to Amend/Correct #14 (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Mobley, Gary) |
| Filing 14 STIPULATION to FOR LEAVE TO FILE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT Complaint - (Discovery) #1 filed by Plaintiffs Sky Posters Inc., Sky Tag, Inc., Sky Tag West, Inc., Sunset & Vine, Inc., West Hollywood Inc., Sky Creative Services, Inc..(Mobley, Gary) |
| Filing 13 JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan ; estimated length of trial 5 days, filed by Plaintiffs Sky Posters Inc., Sky Tag, Inc., Sky Tag West, Inc., Sunset & Vine, Inc., West Hollywood Inc., Sky Creative Services, Inc... (Mobley, Gary) |
|
Filing 12
SCHEDULING ORDER by Judge Otis D Wright, II,( Scheduling Conference set for 11/17/2008 01:30 PM before Judge Otis D Wright II.) (sce)
|
|
Filing 11
ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Otis D Wright, II: Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 11/3/2008, Scheduling Conference set for 11/17/2008 01:30 PM before Judge Otis D Wright II. See order for details. (rne)
|
| Filing 10 ANSWER to Complaint - (Discovery) #1 JURY DEMAND. filed by Defendant City of Los Angeles.(Westhoff, Kim) |
| Filing 9 Notice of Interested Parties filed by Defendant City of Los Angeles, (Courtney, Colleen) |
| Filing 8 FIRST STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to City of Los Angeles answer now due 9/26/2008, filed by Defendant City of Los Angeles.(Courtney, Colleen) |
|
Filing 7
STANDING ORDER regarding newly assigned cases by Judge Otis D Wright II (lc)
|
| Filing 6 MINUTES OF IN CHAMBERS ORDER held before Judge Otis D Wright II: This action has been reassigned to Judge Otis D Wright II. The magistrate judges assignment has changed to the Hon.Frederick F. Mumm. Please substitute the initials ODW(FFMx) in place of the initials SVW(AGRx). Thecase number will now read: CV 08-5434 ODW(FFMx). Henceforth, it is imperative that the initials ODW(FFMx) be used on all documents to prevent delays in the processing ofdocuments. (see document for additional information). (lc) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER RE TRANSFER PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 08-05 -Related Case- filed. Related Case No: CV 08-4762 ODW (FFMx). Case transfered from Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg and Judge Stephen V. Wilson to Judge Otis D Wright, II and Magistrate Judge Frederick F. Mumm for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge CV 08-5434 ODW (FFMx).Signed by Judge Otis D Wright, II (rn)
|
| Filing 4 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed Sky Posters Inc., Sky Tag, Inc., Sky Tag West, Inc., Sunset & Vine, Inc., West Hollywood Inc., Sky Creative Services, Inc., upon City of Los Angeles served on 8/21/2008, answer due 9/10/2008. Original Summons not returned. (Mobley, Gary) |
|
Filing 3
NEW CASE ORDER by Judge Stephen V. Wilson: This case has been assigned to the calendar of Judge Stephen V. Wilson. The Court fully adheres to Rule 1 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure which requires that the Rules be construed to secure the just, speedy and inexpensive determination of every action. (See document for details) (ake)
|
| Filing 2 CERTIFICATION AND NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiffs Sky Posters Inc., Sky Tag, Inc., Sky Tag West, Inc., Sunset & Vine, Inc., West Hollywood Inc., Sky Creative Services, Inc. (et) (ds). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Defendant City of Los Angeles. (Filing fee $ 350 PAID.), filed by Plaintiff Sky Posters Inc., Sky Tag, Inc., Sky Tag West, Inc., Sunset & Vine, Inc., West Hollywood Inc., Sky Creative Services, Inc. (et) (ds). |
| 20 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint - (Discovery) #1 as to Defendant City of Los Angeles. (et) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
