Maria Velazquez et al v. GMAC Mortgage Corporation et al
| Maria Velazquez and Guadalupe Velazquez |
| GMAC Mortgage Corporation, GMAC Mortgage, LLC and DOES |
| 2:2008cv05444 |
| August 19, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Western Division - Los Angeles Office |
| Los Angeles |
| Abrams |
| Pregerson |
| Truth in Lending |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1601 Truth in Lending |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
65
ORDER DENYING Plaintiffs' Motion for Leave to File Second Amended Complaint 59 and Motion to Amend Corrected Motion for Leave to File Second Amended Complaint 60 by Judge Dean D. Pregerson. For the foregoing reasons, the Court DENIES Plaintiffs Motion for Leave to File Second Amended Complaint and Motion to Amend Corrected Motion for Leave to File Second Amended Complaint. (See Order for Details). (sch)
|
|
Filing
31
ORDER continuing the hearing on defendants motion to dismiss 15 to Monday, December 15, 2008 at 10:00 a.m. The Court requests that Plaintiffs submit a Sur-Reply, not to exceed four (4) pages, on the limited issue of whether § 1640(e)would bar any claim Plaintiffs have for damages related to disclosure violations of TILA. Plaintiffs brief should not address any additional issues. Plaintiffs must file this Sur-Reply by 12:00 p.m. on Tuesday, December 9, 2008 by Judge Dean D. Pregerson (lc)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
