Charles E. Walker v. John Dovey
| Charles E. Walker |
| Warden Ken Clark and John Dovey |
| 2:2008cv05587 |
| November 24, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Western Division - Los Angeles Office |
| Cormac J. Carney |
| John E. McDermott |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
49
JUDGMENT by Judge Cormac J. Carney, Related to: Report and Recommendation (Issued) 45 , 48 , 1 . IT IS HEREBY ADJUDGED that the action is dismissed with prejudice. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (san)
|
|
Filing
11
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE by Magistrate Judge Jennifer T. Lum. Therefore, because Petitioner has failed to comply with the Court's September 30, 2008 Order, the C ourt ORDERS Petitioner to show cause in writing why the Petition should not be dismissed without prejudice for failure to exhaust state remedies and for failure to prosecute. Petitioner's Response to the Court's Order to Show Cause shall b e due within ten (10) days of the date of this Order. Petitioner's failure to respond to this Order to Show Cause will be deemed as consent to the dismissal of this case, and the Court will recommend that the matter be dismissed without prejudice. Response to Order to Show Cause due by 12/4/2008. [See document for details.] (ag)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
