Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc. et al v. Axcess Inc. et al
| DC Comics and Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc. |
| Axcess Inc., B.B. Apparels Inc., Joon Sik Bae, Soon Pyo Bae, Seung Hee Chang, Does, Ho Yong Na and Nana Accessory Inc. |
| 2:2008cv05778 |
| December 12, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Western Division - Los Angeles Office |
| Victor B. Kenton |
| Consuelo B. Marshall |
| Copyright |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1338 Copyright Infringement |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
9
CONSENT DECREE PURUSANT TO STIPULATION 8 by Judge Consuelo B. Marshall. Plaintiffs Warner Bros and DC Comics are the owner of all rights in and to the copyright and trademark registrations listed. Defendants and their agents, servants, employees an d all persons in active concert and participation with them who receive actual notice of the injunction are herereby restrained and enjoined from Infringing Plaintiffs' copyrights and trademarks, etc. Each side shall bear its own fees and costs of suit. Except as provided herein, all claims alleged in the Complaint against Defendants are dismissed with prejudice. The Court shall retain jurisdiction of this action to entertain such further proceedings and to enter such further orders as may be necessary or appropriate to implement and enforce the provisions of this Consent Decree. ( MD JS-6. Case Terminated ) (lom)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
