Kurt Barlet v. Consumer Recovery Association
Plaintiff: Kurt Barlet
Defendant: Consumer Recovery Association
Case Number: 2:2008cv06670
Filed: November 25, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Office: Western Division - Los Angeles Office
Presiding Judge: Jacqueline Chooljian
Presiding Judge: Valerie Baker Fairbank
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 25, 2008 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER DISMISSING CASE with prejudice by Judge Valerie Baker Fairbank, re Stipulation to Dismiss Case 9 . (MD JS-6) (kbr)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Kurt Barlet v. Consumer Recovery Association
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kurt Barlet
Represented By: Nicholas J Bontrager
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Consumer Recovery Association
Represented By: Debbie P Kirkpatrick
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?