Arik Rudich v. Metro Goldwyn Mayer Studio, Inc. et al
| Arik Rudich |
| Cinram, Inc., Sony/ATV Music Publishing LLC and Metro Goldwyn Mayer Studio, Inc. |
| 2:2008cv06977 |
| October 22, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Western Division - Los Angeles Office |
| XX US, Outside California |
| Eick |
| Walter |
| Copyright |
| 17 U.S.C. ยง 101 Copyright Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
51
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 18 MOTION to Dismiss, Stay or Transfer. MOTION to Dismiss or Stay pursuant to the first-to-file rule is DENIED, MOTION to Transfer to the Central District of California is GRANTED. Signed by Judge Barbara B Crabb on 10/22/2008. (arw) [Transferred from Wisconsin Western on 10/24/2008.]
|
|
Filing
38
ORDER staying 18 Motion to Dismiss. Defendants Sony/ATV and Cinram have until 10/15/08 to file brief in opposition to defendant Metro Golden Meyer's motion to transfer, or advise the court that they do not oppose the motion. If defendants Sony/ATV and Cinram oppose the motion, defendant Metro Goldwyn Mayer and plaintiff will have five days from the date of service of the opposition brief to file their reply briefs. Signed by Judge Barbara B Crabb on 10/2/08. (vob)[Transferred from Wisconsin Western on 10/24/2008.]
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
