Joe Satriani v. Christopher Martin et al

Joe Satriani |
Christopher Martin, Jonathan Buckland, Guy Berryman, William Champion and Capitol Records |
2:2008cv07987 |
December 4, 2008 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Western Division - Los Angeles Office |
Los Angeles |
Dean D. Pregerson |
Copyrights |
28 U.S.C. § 1338 Copyright Infringement |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 2, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 25 REPORT ON THE DETERMINATION OF AN ACTION Regarding a Copyright. (Closing) (Attachments: # 1 ORDER) (lc) mailed copy to copyright office; Modified on 9/14/2009 (lc). |
![]() |
Filing 23 STIPULATION to Dismiss Case pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) filed by Defendants Christopher Martin, Jonathan Buckland, Guy Berryman, William Champion, Capitol Records. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order For Dismissal With Prejudice)(Steinberg, David) |
Filing 22 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents. The following error(s) was found: stipulation to dismiss case in which answers are on file, FRCP cite is incomplete, however case has Pending Court hearings therefore, a formal proposed order is required, which should have been submitted as a separate attachment to main document. RE: Stipulation to Dismiss Case 21 . In response to this notice the court may order (1) an amended or correct document to be filed (2) the document stricken or (3) take other action as the court deems appropriate. (lc) |
Filing 21 STIPULATION to Dismiss Case pursuant to F.R.C.P. 41(a)(1) filed by Defendants Christopher Martin, Jonathan Buckland, Guy Berryman, William Champion, Capitol Records.(Steinberg, David) |
![]() |
![]() |
Filing 18 MINUTES OF Scheduling Conference held before Judge Dean D. Pregerson: Court and counsel confer re case status. Court sets trial dates. (Refer to the SCHEDULING ORDER to be issued hereafter.)Court Reporter: none. (lc) |
Filing 17 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents. The following error(s) was found: Wrong event: misc(report); Correct Specific Event: Joint Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan RE: Report 16 . In response to this notice the court may order (1) an amended or correct document to be filed (2) the document stricken or (3) take other action as the court deems appropriate. (lc) |
Filing 16 JOINT REPORT of FRCP 26(f) Conference of Counsel and Discovery Plan filed by Plaintiff Joe Satriani. (Miller, Seth) |
![]() |
Filing 14 ANSWER to Complaint - (Discovery) 1 filed by Defendant Capitol Records.(Frackman, Russell) |
Filing 13 ANSWER to Complaint - (Discovery) 1 with JURY DEMAND filed by Defendants Christopher Martin, Jonathan Buckland, Guy Berryman, William Champion.(Frackman, Russell) |
![]() |
Filing 11 Certificate of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Capitol Records, identifying Maltby Investments Limited, Capitol Records, LLC. (Steinberg, David) |
Filing 10 STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File Answer to 4/6/09 re Complaint - (Discovery) 1 filed by Defendant Capitol Records. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order Grantin Capitol Records' Request To Extend Time To Respond To Complaint)(Steinberg, David) |
Filing 9 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by Plaintiff Joe Satriani. upon Christopher Martin waiver sent by Plaintiff on 2/5/2009, answer due 4/6/2009. Waiver of Service signed by Russell J. Frackman, Esq.. (King, Howard) |
Filing 8 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by Plaintiff Joe Satriani. upon William Champion waiver sent by Plaintiff on 2/5/2009, answer due 4/6/2009. Waiver of Service signed by Russell J. Frackman, Esq.. (King, Howard) |
Filing 7 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by Plaintiff Joe Satriani. upon Jonathan Buckland waiver sent by Plaintiff on 2/5/2009, answer due 4/6/2009. Waiver of Service signed by Russell J. Frackman, Esq.. (King, Howard) |
Filing 6 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by Plaintiff Joe Satriani. upon Guy Berryman waiver sent by Plaintiff on 2/5/2009, answer due 4/6/2009. Waiver of Service signed by Russell J. Frackman, Esq.. (King, Howard) |
Filing 5 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by Plaintiff Joe Satriani. upon Capitol Records waiver sent by Plaintiff on 12/18/2008, answer due 2/17/2009. Waiver of Service signed by Alasdair McMullan. (King, Howard) |
Filing 4 MINUTES OF IN CHAMBERS ORDER held before Judge Dean D. Pregerson: This action has been assigned to the calendar of Judge Dean D Pregerson. Counsel are referred to the courts website for additional information. It is not necessary to clear motion date with court clerk prior to filing the motion. Court hears motions only on Mondays at 10:00 AM. The Court requires non-blue backed courtesy copies of only the following manual and electronic filed documents: (1) All noticed motions and related documents; and (2) All ex parte applications and related documents. Said courtesy copies are to be delivered directly to Room 244-J. (lc) |
Filing 3 REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION regarding a copyright (Initial Notification) filed by Joe Satriani. (et) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Joe Satriani. (et) (ds). |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Defendants Christopher Martin, Jonathan Buckland, Guy Berryman, William Champion, Capitol Records. (Filing fee $ 350 PAID.) Jury Demanded., filed by Plaintiff Joe Satriani. (et) (ds). |
20 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint - (Discovery) 1 as to Defendants Christopher Martin, Jonathan Buckland, Guy Berryman, William Champion, Capitol Records. (et) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.