Martha Winkler v. Aetna Life Insurance Company et al
| Martha Winkler |
| Aetna Life Insurance Company, DOES and The National American Red Cross Long Term Disability Plan |
| 2:2008cv08269 |
| January 18, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Western Division - Los Angeles Office |
| A. Howard Matz |
| Carla Woehrle |
| Labor: E.R.I.S.A |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
24
MINUTES IN CHAMBERS by Judge A. Howard Matz: Defendants lodged the Administrative Record, and this matter is now before the Court on Plaintiff's appeal under ERISA of Defendants' denial of benefits. For the following reasons, the Court finds that Defendants did not abuse their discretion in denying Plaintiff's claim for benefits. (See attached Minute Order for further information). (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (jp)
|
|
Filing
22
MINUTES IN CHAMBERS by Judge A. Howard Matz: Court ORDERS the parties to file by not later than 1/25/2010 a status report that provides the Court with either an update on the status of any mediation previously conducted or states the date that the parties have set for mediation. (jp)
|
|
Filing
19
MINUTES OF IN CHAMBERS ORDER held before Judge A. Howard Matz: Court DENIES plaintiff's request for long term disability benefits from defendants 15 .Plaintiff may file a revised request to consider evidence of procedural irregularities. If Pla intiff wishes to do so, she must file her brief, not to exceed eight pages, by not later than September 21, 2009. Defendants may file a reply brief by not later than October 5, 2009. The Court cautions Plaintiff that she should not file a second requ est unless she has a firm basis for doing so. If Plaintiff decides not to file a second request concerning admissible evidence, she must file her opening brief on the merits of this case by not later than October 5, 2009. Defendants must file their reply brief by not later than October 26, 2009. (se)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
