Amanda Bragole v. Hollister Company et al
| Amanda Bragole |
| DOES, John Darling and Hollister Company |
| Attorney Settlement Officer |
| 2:2008cv08273 |
| February 1, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Western Division - Los Angeles Office |
| Stephen J. Hillman |
| Jacqueline H. Nguyen |
| Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
37
ORDER DISMISSING CASE by Judge Jacqueline H. Nguyen (MD JS-6. Case Terminated) (rrey)
|
|
Filing
8
MINUTES OF IN CHAMBERS ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE REMAND TO STATE COURT by Judge Florence-Marie Cooper: On December 16, 2008, this action was removed to this Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1441. However, the jurisdictional allegations appear to be d efective for the reason(s) opposite the box(es) checked: [ X ]Removal is on the basis of diversity jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332. Some of the parties are corporations. The notice of removal is deficient because: [ X ] the jurisdict ion averment by the defendants is patently insufficient under 28 U.S.C.§ 1332(c). Accordingly, the Court orders defendant(s) to show cause in writing no later than February 17, 2008 why this action should not be remanded for the reasons noted a bove. This deadline shall not extend the time for responding to any motion for remand filed by Plaintiff(s). Plaintiff(s) may submit a response in the same time period. Plaintiff(s) must submit a response within 30 days of the date of removal if t he defects are procedural and plaintiff(s) object(s) and request(s) remand. See 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c). The parties are reminded that courtesy copies are to be delivered to Chambers. Failure of defendant(s) to respond by the above date will result in the Court remanding this action to state court. (ama)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
