California Institute of Technology v. Canon U.S.A., Inc. et al
| California Institute of Technology |
| Olympus Imaging America Inc., Canon Inc., Samsung Electronics America Inc, Sony Corp., Nikon, Inc., Canon U.S.A., Inc., Panasonic Corp. of North America, Sony Electronics, Inc, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Nikon Corp., Olympus Corp., Panasonic Corp. and Olympus America Inc |
| 2:2008cv08637 |
| December 31, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Victor B Kenton |
| Mariana R Pfaelzer |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. § 271 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 5, 2010. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 157 REPORT ON THE DETERMINATION OF AN ACTION Regarding a Patent or Trademark. (Closing) (Attachments: #1 order) (lc) |
Filing 156
ORDER by Judge Mariana R. Pfaelzer, re Stipulation to Dismiss Case with prejudice; parties bear own costs and attorney fees #155 , (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (lc)
|
| Filing 155 Amended STIPULATION to Dismiss Case pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) filed by Plaintiff California Institute of Technology. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(DePumpo, Joseph) |
| Filing 154 NOTICE OF ERRATA filed by Plaintiff California Institute of Technology. correcting Stipulation to Dismiss Party #153 (DePumpo, Joseph) |
| Filing 153 STIPULATION to Dismiss Defendant Canon U.S.A., Inc., Canon Inc. filed by Plaintiff California Institute of Technology. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(DePumpo, Joseph) |
|
Filing 152
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO STAY PROCEEDINGS PENDING SETTLEMENT by Judge Mariana R. Pfaelzer until 12/17/09. (pp)
|
| Filing 151 STIPULATION to Stay Case pending Settlement filed by Plaintiff California Institute of Technology.(DePumpo, Joseph) |
| Filing 150 Notice of Withdrawal of Motion to Stay Case, #149 filed by Plaintiff California Institute of Technology. (DePumpo, Joseph) |
| Filing 149 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Stay Case pending Settlement Notice of Settlement In Principle and Joint Motion to Stay Proceedings filed by Plaintiff California Institute of Technology. Motion set for hearing on 11/16/2009 at 10:30 AM before Judge Mariana R. Pfaelzer. (DePumpo, Joseph) |
| Filing 148 MINUTES - IN CHAMBERS (Note change in designation of motion hearing time) by Judge Mariana R. Pfaelzer: Please take notice that all civil motions set by the parties before the Honorable Mariana R. Pfaelzer from this date forward shall be scheduled for and heard on Mondays at 11:00 AM. Court Reporter: Not Reported. (gk) |
|
Filing 147
ORDER DENYING MOTION TO STRIKE AND/OR DISMISS DEFENDANTS' INEQUITABLE CONDUCT DEFENSES AND COUNTERCLAIMS by Judge Mariana R. Pfaelzer: Caltech's Motion to Strike Canon's Affirmative Defenses and Dismiss Counterclaims #142 based on unenforceability due to inequitable conduct is DENIED. (jre)
|
|
Filing 146
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER by Judge Mariana R. Pfaelzer: The hearing for Plaintiffs Motion to Strike and/or Dismiss Inequitable Conduct Defenses and Counterclaims #142 set for November 16, 2009 is hereby taken OFF CALENDAR. The Court will decide the Motion on the papers. (jre) Modified on 10/23/2009 (jre).
|
|
Filing 145
ORDER by Senior, U.S. District Judge Mariana R. Pfaelzer GRANTING Stipulation for Protective Order #141 . (pp)
|
| Filing 144 MINUTE ORDER (In Chambers) by Senior, U.S. District Judge Mariana R. Pfaelzer. The Court has considered Defendants Motion to Compel More Definite Infringement Contentions #131 , the parties Joint Stipulation, Plaintiffs Opposition, and associated papers. A hearing would not assist the Court, as the Motion can be decided on the papers. The Motion is DENIED. The hearing set for October 26, 2009 is hereby taken OFF CALENDAR. (pp) |
| Filing 143 MEMORANDUM of Points and Authorities in Support filed by Plaintiff California Institute of Technology. Re: MOTION to Strike Defendants' Inequitable Conduct Defenses and Counterclaims Answer to Complaint (Discovery), Counterclaim, Answer to Complaint (Discovery), #90 Plaintiff's Notice of Motion and Motion to Strike And/Or Dismiss Defendants MOTION to Strike Defendants' Inequitable Conduct Defenses and Counterclaims Answer to Complaint (Discovery), Counterclaim, Answer to Complaint (Discovery), #90 Plaintiff's Notice of Motion and Motion to Strike And/Or Dismiss Defendants MOTION to Strike Defendants' Inequitable Conduct Defenses and Counterclaims Answer to Complaint (Discovery), Counterclaim, Answer to Complaint (Discovery), #90 Plaintiff's Notice of Motion and Motion to Strike And/Or Dismiss Defendants #142 (Attachments: #1 Declaration Joseph F. DePumpo, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C)(DePumpo, Joseph) |
| Filing 142 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Strike Defendants' Inequitable Conduct Defenses and Counterclaims Answer to Complaint (Discovery), Counterclaim, Answer to Complaint (Discovery), #90 Plaintiff's Notice of Motion and Motion to Strike And/Or Dismiss Defendants' Insufficiently Pled Inequitable Conduct Defenses and Counterclaims filed by Plaintiff California Institute of Technology. Motion set for hearing on 11/16/2009 at 10:00 AM before Judge Mariana R. Pfaelzer. (DePumpo, Joseph) |
| Filing 141 Joint STIPULATION for Protective Order filed by Plaintiff California Institute of Technology. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Kimble, Justin) |
| Filing 140 MINUTES - IN CHAMBERS by Judge Mariana R. Pfaelzer: The hearing on Canon's Motion to Compel More Definite Infringement Contentions #131 is continued to 10/26/2009 at 11:00 AM before Judge Mariana R. Pfaelzer. Court Reporter: Not Reported. (gk) |
| Filing 139 Objection opposition of re: MOTION to Compel More Definite Infringement Contentions #131 Plaintiff's Objection to Canon's Supplemental Memorandum (Dkt 135) and Request for Judicial Notice (Dkt 136) filed by Plaintiff California Institute of Technology. (DePumpo, Joseph) |
|
Filing 137
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO DISMISS DEFENDANTS OLYMPUS IMAGING AMERICA INC. AND OLYMPUS CORPORATION by Judge Mariana R. Pfaelzer: The Court finds that the Stipulation #134 is GRANTED. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that: (1) the claims asserted by California Institute of Technology ("Caltech") against Olympus Imaging America Inc. and Olympus Corporation in this action are hereby dismissed without prejudice; and (2) the counterclaims asserted by Olympus Imaging America Inc. against Caltech in this action #96 are hereby dismissed without prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, with respect to costs and fees associated with Caltech and Olympus, each are to pay their own costs and attorneys' fees. (gk)
|
|
Filing 138
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO DISMISS DEFENDANTS PANASONIC CORP. OF NORTH AMERICA AND PANASONIC CORPORATION by Judge Mariana R. Pfaelzer: The Court finds that the Stipulation of Dismissal #133 is well taken and is, accordingly, GRANTED. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that: (1) the claims asserted by California Institute of Technology ("Caltech") against Panasonic Corp. of North America and Panasonic Corp. in this action are hereby dismissed with prejudice; and (2) the counterclaims asserted by Panasonic Corp. of North America against Caltech in this action #87 are hereby dismissed with prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, with respect to costs and fees associated with Caltech and Panasonic, each are to pay their own costs and attorneys' fees. (gk)
|
| Filing 136 REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE re MOTION to Compel More Definite Infringement Contentions #131 (In Support of Canon's Supplemental Memorandum) filed by Defendants Canon U.S.A., Inc., Canon Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)(Freilich, Seth) |
| Filing 135 SUPPLEMENT to MOTION to Compel More Definite Infringement Contentions #131 (In Support) filed by Counter Claimants Canon U.S.A., Inc., Canon Inc., Defendants Canon U.S.A., Inc., Canon Inc.. (Freilich, Seth) |
| Filing 134 STIPULATION to Dismiss defendant Olympus Corp., Olympus Imaging America Inc. filed by Plaintiff California Institute of Technology. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(DePumpo, Joseph) |
| Filing 133 STIPULATION to Dismiss Case pursuant to settlement filed by Plaintiff California Institute of Technology. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(DePumpo, Joseph) |
| Filing 132 JOINT STIPULATION to MOTION to Compel More Definite Infringement Contentions #131 filed by Plaintiff California Institute of Technology. (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Declaration Richard F. Martinelli, #3 Exhibit, #4 Exhibit, #5 Declaration Joseph F. DePumpo, #6 Exhibit A, #7 Exhibit B, #8 Exhibit C, #9 Exhibit D, #10 Exhibit E, #11 Exhibit F, #12 Exhibit G, #13 Exhibit H, #14 Declaration Kleinfelder, #15 Declaration Traister, #16 Exhibit, #17 Exhibit, #18 Exhibit, #19 Exhibit, #20 Exhibit, #21 Exhibit, #22 Exhibit, #23 Exhibit, #24 Exhibit, #25 Exhibit, #26 Exhibit, #27 Exhibit, #28 Exhibit, #29 Exhibit, #30 Exhibit, #31 Exhibit, #32 Exhibit, #33 Exhibit, #34 Exhibit, #35 Exhibit, #36 Exhibit, #37 Exhibit, #38 Exhibit, #39 Exhibit, #40 Exhibit, #41 Exhibit, #42 Exhibit, #43 Exhibit, #44 Exhibit, #45 Exhibit, #46 Exhibit, #47 Exhibit, #48 Exhibit, #49 Exhibit, #50 Exhibit, #51 Exhibit)(DePumpo, Joseph) |
| Filing 131 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Compel More Definite Infringement Contentions filed by Defendants Canon U.S.A., Inc., Canon Inc.. Motion set for hearing on 10/19/2009 at 10:00 AM before Judge Mariana R. Pfaelzer. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Freilich, Seth) |
| Filing 130 NOTICE of Change of Attorney Information for attorney Todd Richard Miller counsel for Defendants Nikon Corp., Nikon, Inc.. I. Sasha Mayergoyz will no longer receive service of documents from the Clerks Office for the reason indicated in the G-06 Notice. Filed by Defendants Nikon Corporation and Nikon, Inc. (Miller, Todd) |
| Filing 129 NOTICE of Change of Attorney Information for attorney Todd Richard Miller counsel for Defendants Nikon Corp., Nikon, Inc.. David L. Witcoff will no longer receive service of documents from the Clerks Office for the reason indicated in the G-06 Notice. Filed by Defendants Nikon Corporation and Nikon, Inc. (Miller, Todd) |
| Filing 128 NOTICE of Change of Attorney Information for attorney Todd Richard Miller counsel for Defendants Nikon Corp., Nikon, Inc.. Brent P. Ray will no longer receive service of documents from the Clerks Office for the reason indicated in the G-06 Notice. Filed by Defendants Nikon Corporation and Nikon, Inc. (Miller, Todd) |
| Filing 127 NOTICE of Change of Attorney Information for attorney Todd Richard Miller counsel for Defendants Nikon Corp., Nikon, Inc.. Marc S. Blackman will no longer receive service of documents from the Clerks Office for the reason indicated in the G-06 Notice. Filed by Defendants Nikon Corporation and Nikon Inc. (Miller, Todd) |
| Filing 126 NOTICE of Change of Attorney Information for attorney Todd Richard Miller counsel for Defendants Nikon Corp., Nikon, Inc.. Todd R. Miller will no longer receive service of documents from the Clerks Office for the reason indicated in the G-06 Notice. Filed by Defendants Nikon Corporation and Nikon Inc. (Miller, Todd) |
|
Filing 125
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO DISMISS DEFENDANTS NIKON INC. AND NIKON CORP. by Judge Mariana R. Pfaelzer: The Stipulation to Dismiss Defendants Nikon Corp. and Nikon Inc. #124 is GRANTED. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that: (1) the claims asserted by California Institute of Technology ("Caltech") against Nikon Corp. and Nikon Inc. in this action are hereby dismissed with prejudice; and (2) the counterclaims asserted by Nikon Inc. against Caltech in this action #83 are hereby dismissed without prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, with respect to costs and fees associated with Caltech and Nikon, each are to pay their own costs and attorneys' fees. (gk)
|
| Filing 124 STIPULATION to Dismiss Defendant Nikon Corp., Nikon, Inc. filed by Plaintiff California Institute of Technology. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Granting Stipulation to Dismiss Nikon, Inc. and Nikon Corp.)(DePumpo, Joseph) |
|
Filing 123
ORDER GRANTING JOINT MOTION TO STAY PROCEEDING BETWEEN CALTECH AND PANASONIC AND OLYMPUS DEFENDANTS by Judge Mariana R. Pfaelzer: Joint Motion to Stay Proceedings Against the Panasonic and Olympus Defendants #118 is GRANTED. ORDERED that all proceedings in this matter between the California Institute of Technology, on the one hand, and Panasonic Corp., Panasonic Corp. of North America, Olympus Corporation, and Olympus Imaging America, Inc., on the other hand, are hereby stayed until 9/30/2009. (gk)
|
|
Filing 122
ORDER by Judge Mariana R. Pfaelzer: granting #117 Application to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Attorney Patrick A. Traister on behalf of California Institute of Technology, designating Ronald P. Oines as local counsel. (Fee Paid 9/14/09) (lom)
|
| Filing 121 Plaintiff's First Amended Answer to Counterclaims of Defendant Canon U.S.A., Inc. ANSWER to Answer to Complaint (Discovery), Counterclaim, Answer to Complaint (Discovery), #90 filed by Plaintiff California Institute of Technology.(DePumpo, Joseph) |
| Filing 120 Supplemental NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Seth E Freilich on behalf of Counter Claimants Canon U.S.A., Inc., Canon Inc., Defendants Canon U.S.A., Inc., Canon Inc. (Freilich, Seth) |
| Filing 119 Joint Submission of Proposed Claim Construction Terms and Briefing Schedule filed by Plaintiff California Institute of Technology re: Status Conference, #110 (DePumpo, Joseph) |
| Filing 118 NOTICE OF MOTION AND Joint MOTION to Stay Case pending finalization of settlement agreement Notice of Settlement in Principle and Joint Motion to Stay Proceedings Against Panasonic and Olympus Defendants filed by Plaintiff California Institute of Technology. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Proposed Order)(DePumpo, Joseph) |
| Filing 117 APPLICATION for attorney Patrick A. Traister to Appear Pro Hac Vice (PHV FEE NOT PAID.) filed by Plaintiff California Institute of Technology. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Oines, Ronald) |
|
Filing 116
MINUTE ORDER (In Chambers) by Judge Mariana R. Pfaelzer re: Joint Motion for Order for To Deem Admitted Caltech's Deficient Responses to Defendants' Counterclaims #112 . the haring on 9/21/09 at 10:00 a.m. is taken off calendar and no appearances are necessary. (pp)
|
|
Filing 115
MINUTE ORDER (In Chambers) by Judge Mariana R. Pfaelzer. The Court has reviewed Defendants Joint Motion to Deem Admitted Plaintiffs DeficientResponses to Defendants Counterclaims (Docket No. 112). Plaintiff California Institute of Technology is ORDERED to file Amended Answers to Defendants counterclaims by September 14, 2009. No opposition to the Defendants' Joint Motion is required. (pp)
|
|
Filing 114
ORDER by Judge Mariana R. Pfaelzer: granting #113 Motion for Extension of Time to File. IT IS ORDERED that Caltech's deadline to respond to Defendants' Motion is 9/8/2009. (kpa)
|
| Filing 113 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response to Defendants' Joint Motion to Deem Admitted Caltech's Deficient Responses to Defendants' Counterclaims filed by Plaintiff California Institute of Technology. Motion set for hearing on 9/21/2009 at 10:00 AM before Judge Mariana R. Pfaelzer. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Janik, Glenn) |
| Filing 112 NOTICE OF MOTION AND Joint MOTION for Order for To Deem Admitted Caltech's Deficient Responses to Defendants' Counterclaims filed by Defendant, Counterclaim Plaintiff Canon U.S.A. Inc.; Defendant, Counterclaim Plaintiff Olympus Imaging America Inc.; and filed by Defendant, Counterclaim Plaintiff Panasonic Corp. of North America. Motion set for hearing on 9/21/2009 at 10:00 AM before Judge Mariana R. Pfaelzer. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum of Points and Authorities, #2 Declaration of Jennifer L. Yokoyama, #3 Exhibit A, #4 Exhibit B, #5 Exhibit C, #6 Exhibit D, #7 Exhibit E, #8 Exhibit F, #9 Exhibit G, #10 Exhibit H, #11 Proposed Order submitted by Panasonic, #12 Proposed Order submitted by Olympus, #13 Proposed Order submitted by Canon)(Yokoyama, Jennifer) |
| Filing 111 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Jennifer P Gossain on behalf of Defendants Olympus Corp., Olympus Imaging America Inc., Real Party In Interest Defendant Olympus Imaging America Inc., Counter Claimant Olympus Imaging America Inc. (Gossain, Jennifer) |
|
Filing 109
ORDER TRANSFERRING CIVIL ACTION pursuant to Section 3.1 of General Order 08-05. ORDER case transferred from Judge Valerie Baker Fairbank to the calendar of Judge Mariana R. Pfaelzer for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge CV 08-08637 MRP (VBKx). Signed by Judge Valerie Baker Fairbank and Judge Mariana R. Pfaelzer. (rn)
|
| Filing 108 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Glenn E Janik on behalf of Plaintiff California Institute of Technology (Janik, Glenn) |
| Filing 110 MINUTES of Status Conference held before Judge Mariana R. Pfaelzer: Court and counsel discuss the claims and terms at issue. Parties agree to an early markman hearing. Court Orders the parties to meet and confer to agree upon terms at issue and a proposed briefing schedule within 30 days from today's date. Parties will submit a joint proposed schedule and terms to the Court within 40 days from todays date. Court Reporter: Margaret Babykin. (kpa) |
| Filing 107 MINUTES IN CHAMBERS before Judge Valerie Baker Fairbank: COURT ORDER RE TRANSFER OF CASE TO JUDGE MARIANA R. PFAELZER; CONTINUANCE OF SCHEDULING CONFERENCE. This action is hereby assigned to Judge Mariana R. Pfaelzer for all proceedings. On all documents subsequently filed in this case, please substitute the initials MRP after the case number in place of the initials of the prior judge so that the case will now read CV 088637 MRP (VBKx). The Scheduling Conference set for 8/3/2009 at 8:30 AM., is continued to August3, 2009 at 2:30 p.m. and will take place before Judge Pfaelzer in Courtroom 12. (jp) |
| Filing 106 OF SERVICE filed by Plaintiff California Institute of Technology, re Answer to Counterclaim, #105 Proof of Service for Plaintiff's Answer to Counterclaims of Defendant Olympus Imaging America Inc. served on 07/30/2009. (DePumpo, Joseph) |
| Filing 105 Plaintiff's ANSWER to Answer to Complaint (Discovery), Counterclaim, Answer to Complaint (Discovery),, Answer to Complaint (Discovery), #96 Plaintiff's Answer to Counterclaims of Defendant Olympus Imaging America Inc. filed by Plaintiff California Institute of Technology.(DePumpo, Joseph) |
| Filing 104 JOINT RULE 26(F) REPORT filed by Defendants Nikon Corp., Olympus Corp., Panasonic Corp. of North America, Panasonic Corp., Canon U.S.A., Inc., Canon Inc., Nikon, Inc., Plaintiff California Institute of Technology, Real Party In Interest Defendant Olympus Imaging America Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Proposed Schedule)(Janik, Glenn) |
| Filing 103 NOTICE OF DISMISSAL filed by Plaintiff California Institute of Technology pursuant to FRCP 41a(1) as to Samsung Electronics America Inc, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.. (DePumpo, Joseph) |
| Filing 102 OF SERVICE filed by Plaintiff California Institute of Technology, re Answer to Complaint (Discovery), Counterclaim, Answer to Complaint (Discovery), #90 Proof of Service for Plaintiff's Answer to Counterclaims of Defendant Canon U.S.A., Inc. served on 07/13/2009. (DePumpo, Joseph) |
| Filing 101 Plaintiff's ANSWER to Answer to Complaint (Discovery), Counterclaim, Answer to Complaint (Discovery), #90 Counterclaims of Defendant Canon U.S.A., Inc. filed by Plaintiff California Institute of Technology.(DePumpo, Joseph) |
| Filing 100 OF SERVICE filed by Plaintiff California Institute of Technology, re Answer to Counterclaim #99 Proof of Service for Plaintiff's Answer to Counterclaims of Defendant Panasonic Corp. of North America served on 07/13/2009. (DePumpo, Joseph) |
| Filing 99 Plaintiff's ANSWER to Answer to Complaint (Discovery), Counterclaim, Answer to Complaint (Discovery), #87 of Defendant Panasonic Corp. of North America filed by Plaintiff California Institute of Technology.(DePumpo, Joseph) |
| Filing 98 OF SERVICE filed by Plaintiff California Institute of Technology, re Answer to Counterclaim #97 Proof of Service for Plaintiff's Answer to Counterclaims of Defendant Nikon, Inc. served on 07/13/2009. (DePumpo, Joseph) |
| Filing 97 Plaintiff's ANSWER to Counterclaim #83 of Defendant Nikon, Inc. filed by Plaintiff California Institute of Technology.(DePumpo, Joseph) |
| Filing 96 ANSWER, DEFENDES to First Amended Complaint #17 and COUNTERCLAIMS against California Institute of Technology filed by defendant Olympus Imaging America Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits 1 - 5, #2 Exhibit 6 - 13, #3 Exhibit 14, #4 Exhibit 15, #5 Exhibit 16 - Part 1, #6 Exhibit 16 - Part 2, #7 Exhibit 17, #8 Exhibits 18 - 20, #9 Exhibits 21 - 23, #10 Exhibits 24 - 30, #11 Exhibit 31 - Part 1, #12 Exhibit 31 - Part 2, #13 Exhibit 31 - Part 3, #14 Exhibits 32 - 34, #15 Exhibits 35 - 38, #16 Exhibits 39 - 44). (jp) |
| Filing 95 Notice of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Olympus Imaging America Inc., identifying Olympus Corporation.. (Vakil, Bijal) |
| Filing 94 NOTICE of Manual Filing filed by Defendant Olympus Imaging America Inc. of Answer, Defenses and Counterclaims to Plaintiff's Amended Complaint. (Vakil, Bijal) |
| Filing 93 Notice of Withdrawal of Motion to Dismiss Party, #89 filed by defendant Olympus America Inc. (Vakil, Bijal) |
|
Filing 92
ORDER granting Stipulation to Dismiss Party, Stipulation for Joinder, First Stipulation Extending Time to Answer (30 days or less) #84 by Judge Valerie Baker Fairbank. Olympus America Inc. is dismissed from this action without prejudice; Olympus Imaging America Inc. is joined as a defendant in this action; and The date for Olympus Imaging America Inc. to answer Plaintiffs First Amended Complaint (Dkt. No. 17) is hereby extend to July 10, 2009. (kbr)
|
|
Filing 91
ORDER granting First Stipulation Extending Time to Answer (30 days or less), #88 , by Judge Valerie Baker Fairbank. IT IS ORDERED that Samsung Electronics America, Inc.s, and Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.s deadline to answer, move or otherwise respond to Caltechs First Amended Complaint is July 16, 2009. (kbr)
|
| Filing 89 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss defendant Olympus America Inc For Failure to State a Claim filed by defendant Olympus America Inc. Motion set for hearing on 8/3/2009 at 01:30 PM before Judge Valerie Baker Fairbank. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Vakil, Bijal) |
| Filing 88 FIRST STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Samsung Electronics America Inc answer now due 7/16/2009; Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. answer now due 7/16/2009, filed by Defendants Samsung Electronics America Inc; Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order For Extension of Time to Answer)(Tuell, John) |
| Filing 86 Notice of Interested Parties filed by defendant Olympus Corp., (Vakil, Bijal) |
| Filing 85 ANSWER to Amended Complaint,, #17 filed by defendant Olympus Corp..(Vakil, Bijal) |
| Filing 84 Joint STIPULATION to Dismiss defendant Olympus America Inc, Olympus Imaging America Inc., Joint STIPULATION for Joinder in Amended Complaint,, #17 of Olympus Imaging America Inc and Dismissal of Olympus America Inc., FIRST STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Olympus America Inc answer now due 6/25/2009; Olympus Imaging America Inc. answer now due 7/10/2009, filed by defendant Olympus America Inc. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Vakil, Bijal) |
| Filing 90 ANSWER to First Amended Complaint #17 and COUNTERCLAIM against California Institute of Technology, with JURY DEMAND, filed by Defendants, Counter Claimants Canon U.S.A., Inc., Canon Inc. (jp) (Additional attachment(s) added on 6/29/2009: #1 Exhibits A - F, #2 Exhibits G - J, #3 Exhibits K - O, #4 Exhibit P - Part 1, #5 Exhibit P - Part 2, #6 Exhibits Q - S, #7 Exhibits T - Z) (jp). |
| Filing 87 ANSWER to First Amended Complaint #17 and COUNTERCLAIM against California Institute of Technology filed by defendant Panasonic Corp of North America. (Attachments: #1 Part 2, #2 Exhibits 1 - 2, #3 Exhibits 3 - 4, #4 Exhibits 5 - 9, #5 Exhibits 10 - 13, #6 Exhibit 14, #7 Exhibit 15, #8 Exhibit 16 - Part 1, #9 Exhibit 16 - Part 2, #10 Exhibits 17 - 19, #11 Exhibits 20 - 22, #12 Exhibits 23 - 24, #13 Exhibits 25 - 27, #14 Exhibits 28 - 44). (jp) |
| Filing 83 DEFENDANT NIKON INC.'S ANSWER, DEFENSES AND COUNTERCLAIMS against Counter Defendant California Institute of Technology; with Juy Demand, filed by defendant Nikon, Inc. (jp) |
| Filing 82 NOTICE OF ERRATA filed by Defendant Panasonic Corp. of North America. correcting Notice of Manual Filing (G-92) #81 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 31a, #2 Exhibit 31b, #3 Exhibit 31c, #4 Exhibit 31d, #5 Exhibit 32, #6 Exhibit 33, #7 Exhibit 34, #8 Exhibit 35, #9 Exhibit 36, #10 Exhibit 37, #11 Exhibit 38, #12 Exhibit 39, #13 Exhibit 40, #14 Exhibit 41, #15 Exhibit 42, #16 Exhibit 43, #17 Exhibit 44)(Yokoyama, Jennifer) |
| Filing 81 NOTICE of Manual Filing filed by Defendant Panasonic Corp. of North America of Defendant and Counterclaimant Panasonic Corporation of North America's Answer, Defense and Counterclaims. (Yokoyama, Jennifer) |
| Filing 80 Notice of Interested Parties filed by Defendants Panasonic Corp. of North America, Panasonic Corp., identifying Defendant and counterclaimant Panasonic Corporation of North America, Defendant Panasonic Corporation and Plaintiff California Institute of Technology. (Yokoyama, Jennifer) |
| Filing 79 ANSWER to Amended Complaint,, #17 Defendant Panasonic Corporation's Answer and Defenses filed by Defendant Panasonic Corp..(Yokoyama, Jennifer) |
| Filing 78 Certificate of Interested Parties filed by Defendants Nikon Corp., Nikon, Inc., identifying Nikon Corporation and Nikon Inc.. (Miller, Todd) |
| Filing 77 ANSWER to Amended Complaint,, #17 with JURY DEMAND Defendant Nikon Corporation's Answer and Defenses filed by Defendant Nikon Corp..(Miller, Todd) |
| Filing 76 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendants Canon U.S.A., Inc., Canon Inc., identifying Defendant and Counterclaimant Canon U.S.A., Inc., defendant Canon Inc. and plaintiff California Institute of Technology. (Freilich, Seth) |
| Filing 75 NOTICE of Manual Filing filed by Defendant Nikon, Inc. of Defendant Nikon Inc.'s Answer, Defenses and Counterclaims. (Miller, Todd) |
| Filing 74 NOTICE of Manual Filing filed by Defendants Canon U.S.A., Inc., Canon Inc. of Canon U.S.A., Inc. and Canon Inc.'s Answer to Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint and Canon U.S.A.'s Counterclaims [Demand for Jury Trial]. (Freilich, Seth) |
| Filing 73 NOTICE OF DISMISSAL filed by Plaintiff California Institute of Technology pursuant to FRCP 41a(1) as to Sony Electronics, Inc, Sony Corp.. (DePumpo, Joseph) |
|
Filing 72
ORDER by Judge Valerie Baker Fairbank: granting #65 Application to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Attorney Sasha Mayergoyz on behalf of Defendants Nikon Corporation and Nikon, Inc., designating Todd R. Miller as local counsel. (kbr)
|
|
Filing 71
ORDER by Judge Valerie Baker Fairbank: granting #66 Application to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Attorney Brent P. Ray on behalf of Defendants Nikon Corporation and Nikon, Inc., designating Todd R. Miller as local counsel. (kbr)
|
|
Filing 70
ORDER by Judge Valerie Baker Fairbank: granting #67 Application to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Attorney Marc S. Blackman on behalf of Defendants Nikon Corporation and Nikon, Inc., designating Todd R. Miller as local counsel. (kbr)
|
|
Filing 69
ORDER by Judge Valerie Baker Fairbank: granting #68 Application to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Attorney David L. Witcoff on behalf of Defendant, designating Todd R. Miller as local counsel. (kbr)
|
| Filing 68 APPLICATION for attorney David L. Witcoff to Appear Pro Hac Vice (PHV FEE NOT PAID.) filed by Defendants Nikon Corp., Nikon, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Miller, Todd) |
| Filing 67 APPLICATION for attorney Marc S. Blackman to Appear Pro Hac Vice (PHV FEE NOT PAID.) filed by Defendants Nikon Corp., Nikon, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Miller, Todd) |
| Filing 66 APPLICATION for attorney Brent P. Ray to Appear Pro Hac Vice (PHV FEE NOT PAID.) filed by Defendants Nikon Corp., Nikon, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Miller, Todd) |
| Filing 65 APPLICATION for attorney Sasha Mayergoyz to Appear Pro Hac Vice (PHV FEE NOT PAID.) filed by Defendant Nikon Corp., Nikon, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Miller, Todd) |
| Filing 64 NOTICE of Change of Attorney Information for attorney Todd Richard Miller counsel for Defendants Nikon Corp., Nikon, Inc.. Adding Todd R. Miller as attorney as counsel of record for Nikon Corporation and Nikon Inc. for the reason indicated in the G-06 Notice. Filed by Defendants Nikon Corporation and Nikon Inc. (Miller, Todd) |
|
Filing 63
ORDER by Judge Valerie Baker Fairbank: granting #58 Ex Parte Application to Continue. The Scheduling Conference is continued to August 3, 2009 at 8:30 a.m. (kbr)
|
|
Filing 62
ORDER by Judge Valerie Baker Fairbank: granting #57 Application to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Attorney James J. Foster on behalf of Defendants, designating Rory S. Miller as local counsel. (kbr)
|
|
Filing 61
ORDER by Judge Valerie Baker Fairbank: granting #55 Application to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Attorney Charles S. Steenburg on behalf of Defendants, designating Rory S. Miller as local counsel. (kbr)
|
|
Filing 60
ORDER by Judge Valerie Baker Fairbank: granting #56 Application to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Attorney Allen S. Rugg on behalf of Defendants, designating Rory S. Miller as local counsel. (kbr)
|
|
Filing 59
ORDER by Judge Valerie Baker Fairbank: granting #54 Application to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Attorney Michael N. Rader on behalf of Defendants, designating Rory S. Miller as local counsel. (kbr)
|
| Filing 58 Joint EX PARTE APPLICATION to Continue June 29, 2009 Scheduling Conference filed by Plaintiff and Defendants Samsung Electronics America Inc, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.. (Attachments: #1 Declaration James H. Turken, #2 Proposed Order)(Tuell, John) |
| Filing 57 APPLICATION for attorney James J. Foster to Appear Pro Hac Vice (PHV FEE NOT PAID.) filed by defendants Sony Electronics, Inc, Sony Corp.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Miller, Rory) |
| Filing 56 APPLICATION for attorney Allen S. Rugg to Appear Pro Hac Vice (PHV FEE NOT PAID.) filed by defendants Sony Electronics, Inc, Sony Corp.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Miller, Rory) |
| Filing 55 APPLICATION for attorney Charles S. Steenburg to Appear Pro Hac Vice (PHV FEE NOT PAID.) filed by defendants Sony Electronics, Inc, Sony Corp.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Miller, Rory) |
| Filing 54 APPLICATION for attorney Michael N. Rader to Appear Pro Hac Vice (PHV FEE NOT PAID.) filed by defendants Sony Electronics, Inc, Sony Corp.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Miller, Rory) |
|
Filing 53
ORDER by Judge Valerie Baker Fairbank: granting #49 Application to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Attorney Richard F. Martinelli on behalf of Defendant, designating Seth E. Freilich as local counsel. (kbr)
|
|
Filing 52
ORDER by Judge Valerie Baker Fairbank: granting #48 Application to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Attorney Rodger A. Sadler on behalf of Defendant, designating Seth E. Freilich as local counsel. (kbr)
|
|
Filing 51
ORDER by Judge Valerie Baker Fairbank: granting #47 Application to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Attorney Joseph A. Calvaruso on behalf of Defendant, designating Seth E. Freilich as local counsel. (kbr)
|
| Filing 50 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Seth E Freilich on behalf of Defendants Canon U.S.A., Inc., Canon Inc. (Freilich, Seth) |
| Filing 49 APPLICATION for attorney Richard F. Martinelli to Appear Pro Hac Vice (PHV Fee of $185 receipt number 09730000000005362752 paid.) filed by Defendants Canon U.S.A., Inc., Canon Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Freilich, Seth) |
| Filing 48 APPLICATION for attorney Rodger A. Sadler to Appear Pro Hac Vice (PHV Fee of $185 receipt number 09730000000005362710 paid.) filed by Defendants Canon U.S.A., Inc., Canon Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Freilich, Seth) |
| Filing 47 APPLICATION for attorney Joseph A. Calvaruso to Appear Pro Hac Vice (PHV Fee of $185 receipt number 09730000000005362624 paid.) filed by Defendants Canon U.S.A., Inc., Canon Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Freilich, Seth) |
|
Filing 46
ORDER by Judge Valerie Baker Fairbank granting Application to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Attorney Jaime M. Crowe on behalf of Defendant Panasonic Corp, Panasonic Corp of North America, designating Jennifer Yokoyama as local counsel (PHV FEE PAID) #42 . (jp)
|
|
Filing 45
ORDER by Judge Valerie Baker Fairbank granting Application to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Attorney Jack Lever on behalf of defendants Panasonic Corp, Panasonic Corp of North America, designating Jennifer L. Yokoyama as local counsel (PHV FEE PAID) #41 . (jp)
|
|
Filing 44
ORDER by Judge Valerie Baker Fairbank granting Application to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Attorney Monisha Deka on behalf of defendants Panasonic Corp, Panasonic Corp of North America, designating Jennifer L. Yokoyama as local counsel (PHV FEE PAID) #40 . (jp)
|
|
Filing 43
ORDER by Judge Valerie Baker Fairbank granting Application to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Attorney David Tennant on behalf of Defendant Panassonic Corp, Panasonic Corp of North America, designating Jennifer L. Yokoyama as local counsel (PHV FEE PAID) #39 . (jp)
|
| Filing 40 APPLICATION for attorney Monisha Deka to Appear Pro Hac Vice filed by Defendant Panasonic Corp. of North America, Panasonic Corp. Certificate of Good Standing attached. FEE PAID. (kbr) |
| Filing 38 MINUTES before Judge Valerie Baker Fairbank: PROCEEDINGS (IN CHAMBERS): COURT ORDER re Plaintiff's Notice of Errata Regarding Answer Dates #34 and hereby orders that defendants Canon U.S.A., Inc., Nikon, Inc., Panasonic Corp. of North America, and Sony Electronics, Inc., have until 6/23/2009 to respond to Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint; and that defendants Samsung Electronics America, Inc., and Olympus America, Inc., have until 6/25/2009 to respond to Plaintiffs First Amended Complaint. The Scheduling Conference set for 6/29/2009 at 8:30 AM (docket #29) remains as scheduled. (jp) |
| Filing 42 APPLICATION for attorney Jaime M. Crowe on behalf of defendants to Appear Pro Hac Vice, designating of Jennifer Yokoyama as local counsel (PHV FEE PAID) filed by defendants Panasonic Corp of North America, Panasonic Corp. Lodged Order. (jp) |
| Filing 41 APPLICATION for attorney Jack Q. Lever on behalf of defendants to Appear Pro Hac Vice, designating of Jennifer Yokoyama as local counsel (PHV FEE PAID) filed by defendants Panasonic Corp. of North America, Panasonic Corp. Lodged Order. (jp) |
| Filing 39 APPLICATION for attorney David M. Tennant to Appear Pro Hac Vice filed by Defendant Panasonic Corp. of North America, Panasonic Corp. and Certificate of Good Standing. FEE PAID.(kbr) |
| Filing 37 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents. The following error(s) was found: account information was not updated in the ECF system RE: Notice of Appearance #36 . In response to this notice the court may order (1) an amended or correct document to be filed (2) the document stricken or (3) take other action as the court deems appropriate. (vh) |
| Filing 36 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Jennifer Lynette Yokoyama on behalf of Defendants Panasonic Corp. of North America, Panasonic Corp. (Yokoyama, Jennifer) |
| Filing 35 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Shamita D Etienne-Cummings on behalf of Defendants Panasonic Corp. of North America, Panasonic Corp. (Etienne-Cummings, Shamita) |
| Filing 34 NOTICE of Errata Regarding Answer Dates filed by Plaintiff California Institute of Technology. (Janik, Glenn) |
| Filing 33 Corrected NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Bijal V Vakil on behalf of Defendants Olympus America Inc, Olympus Corp. (Vakil, Bijal) |
| Filing 32 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Bijal V Vakil on behalf of Defendants Olympus America Inc, Olympus Corp. (Vakil, Bijal) |
| Filing 31 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by Plaintiff California Institute of Technology. upon Olympus America Inc waiver sent by Plaintiff on 3/27/2009, answer due 5/26/2009. Waiver of Service signed by Robert Middleton. (DePumpo, Joseph) |
| Filing 30 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by Plaintiff California Institute of Technology. upon Olympus Corp. waiver sent by Plaintiff on 3/27/2009, answer due 6/25/2009. Waiver of Service signed by Kazutaka Nakatsuchi. (DePumpo, Joseph) |
| Filing 29 MINUTES IN CHAMBERS before Judge Valerie Baker Fairbank: COURT ORDER. Counsel are hereby notified that a Scheduling Conference has been set for 6/29/2009 at 8:30 AM. Lead Trial Counsel shall attend all proceedings before this Court, including the Scheduling Conference. Counsel are directed to comply with Rule 26(f) of the FRCP and Local Rule 26-1 in a timely fashion and to file a Joint Rule 26(f) Report and a Notice of Settlement Procedure Selection Form ADR-1, on or before 6/15/2009. The Court requests that a conformed courtesy copy of the report be delivered to chambers by 12:00 p.m. the following day. If counsel fail to file the required Joint Rule 26(f) Report and a Notice of Settlement Procedure Selection form or fail to appear at the Scheduling Conference and such failure is not otherwise satisfactorily explained to the Court, the Court may take such action as it deems appropriate, such as monetary sanctions, or ultimately, dismissal or default. (jp) |
| Filing 28 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by Plaintiff California Institute of Technology. upon Samsung Electronics America Inc waiver sent by Plaintiff on 3/27/2009, answer due 5/26/2009. Waiver of Service signed by Anthony Kahng. (DePumpo, Joseph) |
| Filing 27 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by Plaintiff California Institute of Technology. upon Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. waiver sent by Plaintiff on 3/27/2009, answer due 6/25/2009. Waiver of Service signed by S. W. Kim. (DePumpo, Joseph) |
| Filing 26 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by Plaintiff California Institute of Technology. upon Sony Corp. waiver sent by Plaintiff on 3/25/2009, answer due 6/23/2009. Waiver of Service signed by Michael Rader. (DePumpo, Joseph) |
| Filing 25 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by Plaintiff California Institute of Technology. upon Sony Electronics, Inc waiver sent by Plaintiff on 3/25/2009, answer due 5/24/2009. Waiver of Service signed by Michael Rader. (DePumpo, Joseph) |
| Filing 24 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by Plaintiff California Institute of Technology. upon Panasonic Corp. waiver sent by Plaintiff on 3/25/2009, answer due 6/23/2009. Waiver of Service signed by Jack Q. Lever. (DePumpo, Joseph) |
| Filing 23 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by Plaintiff California Institute of Technology. upon Panasonic Corp. of North America waiver sent by Plaintiff on 3/25/2009, answer due 5/24/2009. Waiver of Service signed by Jack Q. Lever. (DePumpo, Joseph) |
| Filing 22 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by Plaintiff California Institute of Technology. upon Nikon Corp. waiver sent by Plaintiff on 3/25/2009, answer due 6/23/2009. Waiver of Service signed by David L. Witcoff. (DePumpo, Joseph) |
| Filing 21 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by Plaintiff California Institute of Technology. upon Nikon, Inc. waiver sent by Plaintiff on 3/25/2009, answer due 5/24/2009. Waiver of Service signed by David L. Witcoff. (DePumpo, Joseph) |
| Filing 20 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by Plaintiff California Institute of Technology. upon Canon Inc. waiver sent by Plaintiff on 3/25/2009, answer due 6/23/2009. Waiver of Service signed by Joseph A. Calvaruso. (DePumpo, Joseph) |
| Filing 19 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by Plaintiff California Institute of Technology. upon Canon U.S.A., Inc. waiver sent by Plaintiff on 3/25/2009, answer due 5/24/2009. Waiver of Service signed by Joseph A. Calvaruso. (DePumpo, Joseph) |
|
Filing 18
ORDER by Judge Valerie Baker Fairbank Granting APPLICATION for attorney Joseph F. DePumpo to Appear Pro Hac Vice #11 by Joseph F. DePumpo to appear on behalf of Plaintiff California Institute of Technology. Ronald P. Oines is designated as local counsel. Fee PAID. (se)
|
| Filing 17 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against defendants Nikon Corp., Olympus America Inc, Olympus Corp., Panasonic Corp. of North America, Panasonic Corp., Sony Electronics, Inc, Sony Corp., Samsung Electronics America Inc, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Canon U.S.A., Inc., Canon Inc., Nikon, Inc., amending Complaint - (Discovery) #1 , filed by plaintiff California Institute of Technology. (jp) (Additional attachment(s) added on 2/3/2009: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G, #8 Exhibit H, #9 Exhibit I, #10 Exhibit J, #11 Exhibit K) (jp). |
|
Filing 16
ORDER by Judge Valerie Baker Fairbank Granting APPLICATION for attorney Glenn E. Janik to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff California Institute of Technology. Ronald P. Oines is designated as local counsel (PHV FEE PAID) #13 . (jp)
|
|
Filing 15
ORDER by Judge Valerie Baker Fairbank Granting APPLICATION for attorney Justin B. Kimble to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff California Institute of Technology. Ronald P. Oines is designated as local counsel (PHV FEE PAID) #12 . (jp)
|
|
Filing 14
ORDER by Judge Valerie Baker Fairbank Granting APPLICATION for attorney Michael W. Shore to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff California Institute of Technology. Ronald P. Oines is designated as local counsel (PHV FEE PAID) #10 . (jp)
|
| Filing 13 APPLICATION for attorney Glenn E. Janik to Appear Pro Hac Vice (PHV FEE NOT PAID.) and CERTIFICATE OF GOOD STANDING filed by Plaintiff California Institute of Technology. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Oines, Ronald) |
| Filing 12 APPLICATION for attorney Justin B. Kimble to Appear Pro Hac Vice (PHV FEE NOT PAID.) filed by Plaintiff California Institute of Technology. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Oines, Ronald) |
| Filing 11 APPLICATION for attorney Joseph F. DePumpo to Appear Pro Hac Vice (PHV FEE NOT PAID.) and CERTIFICATE OF GOOD STANDING filed by Plaintiff California Institute of Technology. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Oines, Ronald) |
| Filing 10 APPLICATION for attorney Michael W. Shore to Appear Pro Hac Vice (PHV FEE NOT PAID.) and CERTIFICATE OF GOOD STANDING filed by Plaintiff California Institute of Technology. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Oines, Ronald) |
|
Filing 9
STANDING ORDER by Judge Valerie Baker Fairbank: Read this order carefully. It controls this case and adds to the Local Rules in some respects. Memoranda of points and authorities in support of, or in opposition to, motions shall not exceed 25 pages. Replies shall not exceed 12 pages. (See document for further details). (kbr)
|
|
Filing 8
ORDER RETURNING CASE FOR REASSIGNMENT by Judge Mariana R. Pfaelzer. ORDER case returned to the Clerk for random reassignment pursuant to General Order 08-05. Case randomly reassigned from Judge Mariana R. Pfaelzer to Judge Valerie Baker Fairbank for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge CV 08-8637 VBF (VBKx). (rn)
|
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF FILING FEE DUE on Pro Hac Vice Application mailed to attorney Justin B. Kimble for Plaintiff California Institute of Technology. (cbr) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF FILING FEE DUE on Pro Hac Vice Application mailed to attorney Glenn E. Janik for Plaintiff California Institute of Technology. (cbr) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF FILING FEE DUE on Pro Hac Vice Application mailed to attorney Joseph F. DePumpo for Plaintiff California Institute of Technology. (cbr) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF FILING FEE DUE on Pro Hac Vice Application mailed to attorney Michael W Shore for Plaintiff California Institute of Technology. (cbr) |
| Filing 3 REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION Regarding a Patent or a Trademark (Initial Notification) filed by California Institute of Technology. (cbr) |
| Filing 2 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff California Institute of Technology, (cbr) (ds). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Defendants Nikon Corp., Olympus America Inc, Olympus Corp., Panasonic Corp. of North America, Panasonic Corp., Sony Electronics, Inc, Sony Corp., Samsung Electronics America Inc, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Canon U.S.A., Inc., Canon Inc., Nikon, Inc..(Filing fee $350 PAID) Jury Demanded, filed by plaintiff California Institute of Technology.(cbr) (Additional attachment(s) added on 1/8/2009: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F) (ds). |
| 20 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint - (Discovery) #1 as to Defendants Nikon Corp., Olympus America Inc, Olympus Corp., Panasonic Corp. of North America, Panasonic Corp., Sony Electronics, Inc, Sony Corp., Samsung Electronics America Inc, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Canon U.S.A., Inc., Canon Inc., Nikon, Inc. (cbr) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
