Anthony Brumfield v. Anthony Hedgpeth

Justia Dockets & Filings Ninth Circuit California Central District Anthony Brumfield v. Anthony Hedgpeth

Anthony Brumfield v. Anthony Hedgpeth

Petitioner:	Anthony Brumfield
Respondent:	Anthony Hedgpeth
Case Number:	2:2009cv00108
Filed:	June 15, 2010
Court:	US District Court for the Central District of California
Office:	Western Division - Los Angeles Office
Presiding Judge:	Margaret M. Morrow
Nature of Suit:	Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
September 23, 2012	Filing 57 JUDGMENT by Judge Margaret M. Morrow, IT IS HEREBY ADJUDGED that the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is denied and this action is dismissed with prejudice. Related to: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2254) 1 , R&R - Accepting Report and Recommendations, 56 (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (lmh)
June 15, 2010	Filing 26 ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Judge Margaret M. Morrow. The Court concurs with and adopts the findings, conclusions, and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED t hat Respondent's Motion to Dismiss be DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner's request for leave to file a First AmendedPetition be GRANTED. Petitioner shall file a First Amended Petition amending Claim 3 within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order. IT IS SO ORDERED (See attached order for further details) (es)

Date Filed

Document Text

September 23, 2012

Filing 57 JUDGMENT by Judge Margaret M. Morrow, IT IS HEREBY ADJUDGED that the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is denied and this action is dismissed with prejudice. Related to: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2254) 1 , R&R - Accepting Report and Recommendations, 56 (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (lmh)

June 15, 2010

Filing 26 ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Judge Margaret M. Morrow. The Court concurs with and adopts the findings, conclusions, and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED t hat Respondent's Motion to Dismiss be DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner's request for leave to file a First AmendedPetition be GRANTED. Petitioner shall file a First Amended Petition amending Claim 3 within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order. IT IS SO ORDERED (See attached order for further details) (es)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Anthony Brumfield v. Anthony Hedgpeth
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Anthony Brumfield
Represented By:	Ronald White
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: Anthony Hedgpeth
Represented By:	Dana Muhammad Ali
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?