Fatima Palacios v. Saxon Mortgage Services, Inc. et al
| Amerimax Lending, Inc., DOES, Deutsche Bank National Trust Co. and Saxon Mortgage Services, Inc. |
| 2:2009cv00337 |
| July 10, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Western Division - Los Angeles Office |
| Rosalyn M. Chapman |
| Philip S. Gutierrez |
| Consumer Credit |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal - Fair Credit Reporting Act |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
12
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS): ORDER by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez Granting Saxon Mortgage Services, Inc.'s and Deutsche Bank National Trust's 9 Motion to Dismiss. The Court GRANTS Saxon's and Amerimax's Motion to Dismiss Palacios' First, Second, Third, Fourth, Fifth, and Seventh Causes of Action, without prejudice. However, the Court GRANTS the Motion to Dismiss Palacios' Sixth and Eighth Causes of Action, with prejudice. If Palacios so chooses to file an amended complain t, she must do so within 21 days. A failure to do so may result in the dismissal of this action. Additionally, Palacios is reminded that although she is a pro se litigant, she is required to follow the same rules of procedure that govern other litigants. King v. Atiyeh, 814 F.2d 565, 567 (9th Cir. 1987). This includes Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11. Thus, if Palacios chooses to file an amended complaint, she is advised that she must have a proper factual basis for her claims. (mg)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
