Continental Casualty Company et al v. Soco West, Inc. et al
Continental Casualty Company and The Continental Insurance Company |
Does and Soco West, Inc. |
Continental Casualty Company and The Continental Insurance Company |
Soco West, Inc. |
2:2009cv00413 |
November 24, 2009 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Western Division - Los Angeles Office |
A. Howard Matz |
Andrew J. Wistrich |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal - Insurance Contract |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 152 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) by Judge A. Howard Matz: In light of the Court's November 24, 2009 ORDER, Defendants Soco West, Inc.'s Motion to Strike 69 , 78 are DENIED as moot. (jp) |
Filing 151 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) by Judge A. Howard Matz: The Court finds that the most efficient way to adjudicate the issues on which Plaintiffs seek summary adjudication is by considering a single motion. Accordingly, the Court DENIES without prejudice each of the pending partial motions for summary judgment1 55 , 58 , 61 and 65 and ORDERS the parties to proceed in the following way if they intend to pursue summary judgment practice. (See attached Minute order for further details). The Court vacates the pretrial conference date of November 30, 2009 and the trial date of December 8, 2009, and will make a determination as to how to handle this overblown case after receiving any new motion from Plaintiffs. (jp) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.